William Gray Matthew Gray James Bernard O'Rourke Appellants Against HM Advocate
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Neutral Citation | 1994 SCCR 225 |
| Date | 1994 |
| Court | Unspecified Court (Scotland) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Daniel Mcneil Mcgill Adam V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...1061). If the juror's conduct was an irregularity, it affected the entire verdict (McTeer v HM Adv, 2003 SCCR 282). In Gray v HM Adv (1994 SCCR 225) the court held that a visit to the locus by a juror was not per se an impropriety; and that if there was evidence-gathering on a such a visit,......
-
Adam v HM Advocate
...295; 2003 SCCR 108 Gordon v HM AdvocateSCUNK [2005] HCJAC 84; 2006 JC 87; 2006 SCCR 1 Gray v HM AdvocateSCUNK 1994 JC 105; 1994 SLT 1237; 1994 SCCR 225 Gray v HM Advocate (No 2)UNK 2005 1 JC 233; 2005 SLT 159; 2005 SCCR 106 Kerr v HM AdvocateUNK 1999 SLT 1359; 1999 SCCR 763 McCadden v HM Ad......
-
Gray v HM Advocate
...the present appellants and that accordingly no miscarriage of justice had occurred (para 32); and appeals refused. Gray v HM AdvocateUNK 1994 SCCR 225 affirmed. William Gray and James Bernard O'Rourke were charged along with others and convicted following trial in the High Court of Justicia......
-
Referral By The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission In The Cases Of William Gray+james Bernard O'rourke V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...much more about the background to this trial than the appeal court did when it considered the appeals against conviction (Gray v HM Adv, 1994 SCCR 225). [2]I recognise, of course, that the Commission and those representing the appellants, and consequently the court itself, have been constra......