William Hawtry port Action de dett envers Edward Aweher un des fits & heirs
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 326
DEL COMMON-BANK
XXII. William Ha-wtry port Action de dett envers Edward Awcher un des fits & heirs de Anthony Awcher, Will. Awcher auter dea fits & heirs, & Ann Awcher file & heir John Awcher auter des fits & heirs le dit Anthony, Edward and Will, fuerunt utlagati, & Ann fiat waive, le Roigne pardon a Edward & William le dit utlagary sur que ils sue Scire facias vers le dit William Hawtry ad sequendum vers eux, sur que Hawtry appere & declare que les dits Edward & William Awcher simul cum le dit Ann debent & injuste detinent de luy 200. libf de eo quod dictus Antonius pater dicti Edwardi & Willielmi & Johannis cujus heredes prteHicti Edwardus & Willielmus Awcher simul cum prssdicta Anna filia & htered. prsedicti Johannis jam defuncti raodo aunt eo quod dictus Antonius tempore mortis sue fuit seisin del Manuor de Otterden en Kent que eat partable enter lea males & discend a les tres fits, Apres quel le dit John mo?, son part discend a Ann que ore eat waive, ac de eo quod dictus Antoniua per son fait deveign oblige & le dit W...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Barrington Earl Frankson v General Legal Council
...his fees were taxed. After making inquiries into the matter, he wrote to the appellant but received no response to his letters of 26 November and 10 December 1996. It was also his evidence that although he requested a statement of account from the appellant, none was ever received. 19 In ev......
-
Kenny D. Anthony Claimant v Vaughn Lewis Defendant [ECSC]
...reflect the recent attitudeof the Courts in the U.S.A. towards managing and reconciling this existing tension, reflected in Section 10( 1) and 10(2) of The Constitution (See reproduction of these provisions at paragraph 13 of this Judgment). 146 It was submitted in substance that Dr. Lewis'......
-
Millennium Financial Ltd Appellant v [1] Thomas Mc Namara [2] Bank of Nevis International Ltd Respondents [ECSC]
...a company incorporated in Uruguay (hereinafter Millennium Uruguay), for alleged violations of sections 17(a) of the Securities Act 1933 and 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act 1934. On 6th December 2002, the SEC obtained an order appointing Thomas W. Mc Namara ("The US Receiver") as receiv......
-
Fowler v Keegan Quarries Ltd
... ... surprised that you have failed to take action and to have the illegal activities of Mr. Keegan ... ...