William Howard, Esquire, v Sir John Lenthall, Marshal de B. R
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1655 |
| Court | Exchequer |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Duppa, Executor of Baskerville v Mayo
...146. Hence it seems to follow, that what Lord Hale is said to have laid down in a former case upon the same will (Seymour v. Nosworthy, Hardr. 376), namely, "that a second substantive independent will, though it does not by express words import a revocation of a former will, or pass any lan......
-
O'Leary v Douglass
...v. GrantUNK 1 Macq. 163. Harwood v. Goodright, lessee of Rolfe Cowp. 87. Hitchins v. BassettENR 3 Mod. 203. Seymour v. NosworthyENR Hard. 376. Pemberton v. Pemberton 13 Ves. 290. Cutto v. GilbertUNK 18 Jur. 560; 9 Moo. P. C. C. 131. Glazier v. GlazierENR 4 Burr. 2512. Methuen v. MethuenENR ......
-
Cutto v Gilbert
...cases :- Hutching v. Basset (3 Mod. 203 ; S.C. Comb. 90 ; 2 Salk. 592 ; 1 Show. 527 ; Show. Cas. Parl. 146), Seymour v. Nosvjorthy (Hard. 376), Goodtitle and Ralph v. Harwood (3 Wils. 497 ; S.C. Cowp. 87 ; 7 Bro. P.C. 489 (2nd Edit.) ; and see Powell on Devises, p. 541 (3rd Edit.) ), Goodri......
-
Hitchins v Basset
...not expressly import a revocation of a former will, nor pass any land, yet, in construction of law, it will amount to a reveeation, S. C. Hard. 376. S. C. Show. P. C. 146. In the case Goodrig/it on Demise of Rolfe v. Harwood, Hilary term, 14 Geo. 3, where, in a special verdict, it was found......
Request a trial to view additional results