Williams (Noel) v R
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1997 |
| Date | 1997 |
| Year | 1997 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
33 cases
-
Courtney Lawes v R
...given to them…. In my view, these were serious omissions.’ 41 Indeed Lord Hope of Criaghead in delivering the judgment of the Board in Williams {Noel) v R (1997) 51 WIR 202 (approving R v Hassock ) made it clear that if the suspect is known to the witness he may be confronted by the witness......
-
Peart (Omar) v R
...16The dicta of Melville JA at page 138 in the Hassock case were approved by their Lordships' Board in the Privy Council in Williams (Noel) v R (1997) 51 WIR 202.The headnote of that case reads: "Where a witness to an incident knows well the person suspected of involvement in the incident, ......
-
Tido v R
...evidence was undesirable in principle and the jury would require to approach it with great care: R v Graham [1994] Crim LR 212 and Williams (Noel) v The Queen [1997] 1 WLR 18 In Pipersburgh and Robateau v The Queen [2008] UKPC 11 the Board re-affirmed (in para 10) its rejection of the sug......
-
N.c. V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...of the Bahamas), France and Vassell v The Queen supra (an appeal from the Court of Appeal of Jamaica), and Williams v The Queen [1997] 1 WLR 548 (an appeal from the Court of Appeal of Jamaica). [17] The first observation to be made about Tido is that it is a decision of the Judicial Committ......
Request a trial to view additional results