Williams v Wallis & Cox
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1914 |
| Year | 1914 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
-
Galway City Council v Samuel Kingston Construction Ltd and Another
... ... Similarly, Atkin J., in Williams v. Wallis and Cox [1914] 2 K.B. 478 stated, at p. 485, that the expression "does not necessarily involve personal turpitude on the part of the ... ...
-
John Mowlem Construction Ltd (t/a Irishenco Construction) & Carillion Irishenco (formerly Irishenco Construction) v Dublin City Council & Higgins
... ... 480 1991 2 WLR 1234 1991 1 AER 653 CHAMPSEY BHARA & CO v JIVRAJ BALLO SPINNING & WEAVING CO LTD 1923 AC 480 1923 AER REP 235 WILLIAMS v WALLIS & COX 1914 2 KB 478 SHEAHAN v FBD INSURANCE PLC UNREP SUPREME 20.7.1999 (EX TEMPORE) RUSSELL RUSSELL ON THE LAW OF ARBITRATION ... ...
-
The National Housing Trust v YP Seaton & Associates Company Ltd (Jamaica)
... ... 51 As Atkin J remarked with regard to the word "misconduct" in Williams v Wallis and Cox [1914] 2 KB 478, 485 : "That expression does not necessarily involve personal turpitude on the part of the arbitrator, ... ...
-
McCarthy v Keane
...had been procedurally disadvantaged by the rulings of the arbitrator and that this would suffice. Atkin J in Williams v Wallis and Cox [1914] 2 KB 478, at page 484 spoke of the meaning of the expression: "That expression does not necessarily involve personal turpitude on the part of the ar......
Request a trial to view additional results