Willoughby v Eckstein
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1936 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Baird Textile Holdings Ltd v Marks and Spencer Plc
...Mummery J in Bristol & West BS v Turner [1991] 2 EGLR 52, 54 that the duty of this court is to apply the law as it stands. See also Willoughby v Eckstein [1936] 1 All ER 650 and Derby v Weldon (No.3) [1989] 3 All ER 118, 124. It must follow that it cannot be a compelling reason for requirin......
-
Baird Textile Holdings Ltd v Marks & Spencer Plc
...v MaherUNK (1988) 164 CLR 387. Western Fish Products Ltd v Penwith District CouncilUNK [1981] 2 All ER 204. Willoughby v EcksteinUNK [1936] 1 All ER 650. Wilson v Partenreederei Hannah BlumenthalELR [1983] AC 854. Woodhouse AC Israel Cocoa Ltd SA v Nigerian Produce Marketing Co LtdELR [1972......
-
G & S Brough Ltd v Salvage Wharf Ltd and Another
...or diminish the light… enjoyed by the lessee…” This was held to be an agreement within section 3. 92 Willoughby v Eckstein (No 2) [1937] Ch 167 is another example of the second category. The clause in the lease excluded “any rights of light… over other ground” and was “subject… to the ad......
-
RHJ Ltd v FT Patten (Holdings) Ltd
... ... during the interim period and accordingly (as provided in Section 3) preclude any easement arising by prescription under the Act (see Willoughby" v Eckstein [1937] Ch 167 ).” ... 12 Mr Francis fastens on that part of Lightman J's summary which speaks of \xE2\x80" ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results