Wilson v First County Trust Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 23 November 2000 |
| Date | 23 November 2000 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
-
Southern Pacific Personal Loans Ltd v Walker
...which, in our judgment, follows from the plain meaning of subsection (4), is supported by the authorities: see in particular Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] QB 407, Watchtower Investments Ltd v Payne [2001] EWCA Civ 1159, [2001] GCCR 3055 and Wilson v Robertsons (London) Ltd [2005......
-
Car Crash Line Ltd, Car Crash Line UK Ltd v Branton Edwards (A Firm)
...March 2001, after the coming into force of the Human Rights Act 1998 on 2nd October 2000. 8 The case of Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] QB 407 came before the Court of Appeal (consisting of Sir Andrew Morritt V-C, Chadwick and Rix LJJ) on 9th November 2000. The matter was adjourned f......
-
Wilson v First County Trust Ltd (No 2)
...1998 came into force. The Court of Appeal, comprising Sir Andrew Morritt V-C, and Chadwick and Rix LJJ, allowed Mrs Wilson's appeal: see [2001] QB 407. Sir Andrew Morritt V-C recognised there was considerable force in First County Trust's submissions in support of the judge's view. But hav......
-
Society of Lloyd's v Laws and Others
...of action but this must be a rare event, since most statutes will directly impact substantive law. Wilson v First County Trust Ltd (No 2) [2001] QB 407 may present such a rare case because the terms of section 127(3) of the Consumer Credit Act prevent the making of an enforcement order in p......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Supreme Court Rules In Favour Of Lender
...concluded that based on the language of the Act and following the previous authorities (in particular Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] QB 407), the fee of £875 was part of the total cost of, or charge for, credit and therefore could not be treated as part of the credit. There was no i......