Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Windsor Life Assurance v Mulvaney. Court of Appeal, Civil Division: Henry LJ and Pill LJ

Document Cited in Related
Vincent
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1108/eb025033
Published date01 January 2000
Date01 January 2000
Pages81-83
Subject MatterAccounting & finance
Refusal to hear evidence of compliance
specialist upheld by Court of Appeal
Windsor Life Assurance v Mulvaney
Court of Appeal, Civil Division: Henry LJ and Pill LJ
Date of Judgment: 5th May, 1999
Refusal to hear evidence of compliance specialist upheld by Court of Appeal
FACTS
The Defendant, Mr Mulvaney, had been
employed by the claimant, Windsor Life
Assurance Company Ltd, the appointment
being governed by the rules of LAUTRO.
He terminated his engagement in March
1992 and the claimant brought proceedings
for repayment of monies advanced by the
claimant to him and which it alleged he
was liable to repay. The Defendant coun-
terclaimed for damages he alleged were
caused by references given by the claimant
in respect of him to J Rothschild Assurance
and Allied Dunbar. He alleged that these
references were false and that their publica-
tion constituted a malicious falsehood and/
Page 81

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT