Wingrove v Prestige & Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1953 |
| Year | 1953 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Bryers v Canadian Pacific Steamships Ltd
...were on fire did not come within the class of persons employed for whose benefit the regulation was enacted. In ( Wingrove v. Prestige 1954 1 A.E.R. 576) it was held that a clerk of the works employed upon a building site by the owners of the site was not entitled to a cause of action as a......
- Loh Tuan Woon; Ng Siew Eng and Another
-
Smith v George Wimpey & Company Ltd
...see Claydon v. Sir Lindsay Parkinson Ltd. (1939) 2 K.B. 385: nor to the workmen employed by the building owner, see Wingrove v. Prestige & Co. Ltd. E (1954) 1 W.L.R. 524; nor to a man engaged as an independent contractor and not as a servant, see Herbert v. Harold Shaw Ltd. (1959) 2 Q.B. 13......
- Howitt v Alfred Bagnall and Sons Ltd
1 books & journal articles
-
The site
...to whom no duty of care was owed. It is doubtful that this case would be decided the same way today); Wingrove v Prestige & Co Ltd [1953] 1 WLr 449. he duty of care owed by an occupier of land was of a higher level in respect of invitees. he distinction between these categories has now (act......