Winkworth v Christie Manson and Woods Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1980
Year1980
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 cases
  • Diamond Centre Pte Ltd and Another v R Esmerian, Inc and Another and Another Appeal
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • September 26, 1996
    ...v Sewell (1860) 5 H & N 728; Janesich v George Attenborough & Son (1910) 26 TLR 278 and Winkworth v Christie Manson and Woods Ltd & Anor (1980) 1 Ch 496. Janesich v George Attenborough is directly in point. In that case, the plaintiff, a Parisian jeweller, entrusted a diamond necklace to G ......
  • Trade Credit Finance No (1) Ltd and National Westminster Bank Plc and Dinc Bilgin Lime Company Ltd and Coutts & Company
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • November 3, 2004
    ...Farm v Suffolk Agricultural Poultry Producers Ass. [1966] 1 WLR 278, 330; Cammell v Sewell (1858) 3 H&N 617, 5 H&N 728; Winkworth v Christie Manson and Woods Ltd [1980] Ch 496), Sabah acquired good title in the press when it was delivered to Sabah in Turkey. It is also unaffected by the fac......
  • Dornoch Ltd v Westminster International BV [QBD (Admiralty)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Admiralty)
    • April 29, 2009
    ...must resolve under this Issue as to the applicability of the doctrine of renvoi was identified and expressly left open by Slade J in Winkworth v. Christie [1980] Ch. 496 at 514DE and by Moore-Bick J in Glencore v. Metro [2001] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 284 at 297. However in two further decisions at f......
  • Macmillan Inc. v Bishopsgate Investment Trust Plc (No. 3)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • November 2, 1995
    ...it is, that disposition is binding everywhere." 93This was treated as the general rule, although subject to exceptions, in Winkworth v. Christie Manson & Woods Ltd (1990) Ch.496. It was applied by the House of Lords to a dispute about priority in Inglis v. Robertson (1898) AC 616, although ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • The Restitution, Repatriation, and Return of Cultural Objects: When Objects Go Back
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • February 25, 2015
    ...and were taken to Italy, where they were sold to an apparently innocent purchaser. [See Winkworth v. Christie, Manson & Woods Ltd., [1980] Ch. 496 , [1980] 1 All E.R. 1121]. Later, that purchaser consigned the artworks to an auction house in London for sale. The collector from whom the obje......
7 books & journal articles
  • THE FINE ART OF FRAUD.
    • United Kingdom
    • Art Antiquity & Law Vol. 27 No. 4, December 2022
    • December 1, 2022
    ...40, at 7-001. (56) Tettenborn, above, note 52, at p. 156. (57) For example, Italy. (58) Winkworth v. Christie Manson & Woods Ltd [1980] 2 W.L.R. 937; Iran v. Berend [2007] EWHC (59) (1858) 3 H & N 617, at p. 638. (60) Winkworth v. Christie Manson & Woods Ltd [1980] 2 W.L.R. 937.......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Property
    • August 5, 2021
    ...(4th) 319 (Man CA) .......................................................................147 Winkworth v Christie Manson and Woods Ltd, [1980] Ch 496 (Ch D) ........... 236 Winter v Keating (1978), 35 APR 633, 24 NSR (2d) 633 (CA) ...........................260 Wylie v McCarron, 2020 NBCA ......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Conflict of Laws
    • September 8, 2010
    ...3 W.W.R. 57, [1983] A.J. No. 559 (Q.B.) ........................................... 320 Winkworth v. Christie, Manson and Woods Ltd., [1980] Ch. 496, [1980] 1 All E.R. 1121 .......................................................... 333, 334 Winmill v. Winmill, [1974] 1 F.C. 686, 47 D.L.R. (......
  • Competing Rights
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Property
    • August 5, 2021
    ...to tell them apart. The law provides rules to resolve the competing claims of those who owned the goods that went into the mixture. 7 [1980] Ch 496 (Ch D). Competing Right s 237 B. COMMON LAW 1) Nemo Dat When dealing with a competition between legal property rights, the best place to start ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT