Winnipeg Electric Company v Jacob Geel
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1932 |
| Year | 1932 |
| Date | 1932 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
47 cases
-
H.C. v. Loo, (2003) 403 A.R. 212 (QB)
...Uned. 393 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 46]. May v. Julien, [1989] B.C.J. No. 2224 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 46]. Winnipeg Electric Co. v. Geel, [1932] A.C. 690 (P.C.), refd to. [para. Williams v. Fedoryshin, [1959] S.C.R. 249, refd to. [para. 63]. Feener v. MacKenzie, [1972] S.C.R. 525; 3 N.S.R.(2......
-
Hisco v. Stitz, 2008 MBQB 45
...Melnychuk v. Moore and Associated Beer Distributors Ltd. (1989), 57 Man.R.(2d) 174, refd to. [para. 5]. Geel v. Winnipeg Electric Co., [1932] A.C. 690 (P.C.), refd to. [para. 5]. Mikuletic v. Harvie (1979), 1 Man.R.(2d) 156 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 5]. Bese v. Mayan, [1971] B.C.J. No. 467 (S......
-
White v. Guptill, (1973) 5 N.S.R.(2d) 638 (CA)
...matter of onus, quoted with approval from the judgment delivered by Lord Wright in Winnipeg Electric Co. v. Geel, [1932] 4 D.L.R. 51; [1932] A.C. 690; [1932] 3 W.W.R. 49, as follows [at p. 105]: 'But the onus which the section places on the defendant is not in law a shifting or transitory o......
-
Guymer v. Registrar of Motor Vehicles, (1984) 61 N.S.R.(2d) 325 (TD)
...referring to the matter of onus, quoted with approval from the judgment delivered by Lord Wright in Winnipeg Electric Company v. Geel, [1932] A.C. 690, as follows: 'But the onus which the section places on the defendant is not in law a shifting or transitory onus: it cannot be displaced mer......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Selected Judgments
...the accident would indeed have been inevitable. Such indeed was the plea in Winnipeg Electric Selected Judgments | 201 Company v Geel [1932] AC 690, the facts of which bear a striking resemblance to the facts of this case. Perhaps the position is most logically analysed by Lord Greene, who ......