Woodall v Pearl Assurance Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1919 |
| Date | 1919 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
27 cases
-
Ennia General Insurance Company Ltd Appellant v J. Astaphan & Company (1970) Ltd Respondent [ECSC]
...for the respondent cited about ten cases which either followed or examined or distinguished Jureidini's case. They included WOODALL v. PEARL ASSOCIATION COMPANY LTD. (1918–19) All E.R. Rep. 544;MACURA v. NORTHERN ASSOCIATION CO. LTD. (1925) A.C. 619,TOLLER v. LAW ACCIDENT INSURANCE SOCIETY ......
- Dalmia Dairy Industries Ltd v National Bank of Pakistan
-
Heyman v Darwins Ltd
...is relied upon as disentitling the claimant to recover, the arbitration clause is effective. The distinction is pointed out in Woodall v. Pearl Assurance Co. (1919), 1 K.B. 593, approved by Lord Sumner in your Lordships' House in Macaura v. Northern Assurance Company (1925), A.C. 619 at p.......
-
Macaura v Northern Assurance Company, Ltd and Others
...it and say that, according to its terms, express and implied, they are relieved from liability (see Stebbing's case, 1917, 2 K.B. 433; Woodall's case, 1919, 1 K.B. 593). It is a fallacy to say that they assert the policy to be null and void. They do not plead or mention the Gaming Act, an......
Request a trial to view additional results