Woodcock v London and North Western Railway Company

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1913
Year1913
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
  • Wagenaar v Thomas
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...how much compensation is paid. See Page v Burtwell (1908, 2 K.B, p. 758); Woodcock v London & N. W. Ry. Co. (6 Butterworth, p. 471; 1913, 3 K.B. 139); Alden v Stuart (9 Butterworth 418). The receipt of compensation is fatal to a workman's claim for damages. Frame v Taylor (11 Butterworth, p......
  • Glenn Andrew Joseph Hickson v Goodman Fielder Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 12 March 2009
    ...285 at 313 [65]; [1998] HCA 20. 27Page v Burtwell [1908] 2 KB 758 at 762, 763, 764; Woodcock v London and North Western Railway Company [1913] 3 KB 139 at 28 (1962) 106 CLR 426 at 445. 29 Goodman Fielder Ltd v Hickson [2008] NSWCA 69 at [24] . 30 New South Wales, Legislative Council, Parlia......
1 books & journal articles
  • Preliminary Sections
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1991. Part I Preliminary Sections
    • 2 December 2022
    ...v. Gudi (1987) 5 S.C. 291 at 326. ................................................... 122 Woodcock v. London & N.Western RIy. Co. (1913) 3 K.B. 139. Yanor & Anor v. The State (1965) N.M.L.R. 337. . . .................................. 460 Yanor & Anor. v. The State (1965) N.M.L.R. 337. 592 ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT