Woolfenden v Woolfenden
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1947 |
| Date | 1947 |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
27 cases
-
Wiseman v Wiseman
...This should have been done. I do not think the Order was a nullity, as would be, for example, an Order made without jurisdiction ( Wolfenden v. Wolfenden, 1948 Probate, page 27, Craig v. Kanssen, 1943 1 King's Bench, page 256). The latter case was concerned with a failure to serve. The Orde......
-
Nadeem Shahzad v Nusrat Mazher
...They are all cases where a decree has been held to be void because of a fundamental procedural irregularity. In Woolfenden v. Woolfenden [1948] P. 27 the application for decree absolute was made before the statutory time had elapsed. In Ali Ebrahim v. Ali Ebrahim [1983] 1 W.L.R. 1336 there......
-
Purse v Purse
...a decree absolute, notwithstanding that an application to set aside such a decree may also be made to a judge at first instance ( Woolfenden v. Woolfenden (1948) P.27 and Dryden v. Dryden (1973) Fam. 217). 16 Miss Windridge's difficulties would have been very much less had she been able to ......
-
Dennis v Dennis (Queen's Proctor intervening)
...Group plc v Hodgson [1994] QB 179, [1993] 4 All ER 143, [1993] 3 WLR 830, CA. Walker v Walker [1987] 1 FLR 31, CA. Woolfenden v Woolfenden [1948] P 27, [1947] 2 All ER 653, X v Federal Republic of Germany (1975) Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1, ECom HR. ApplicationFollowing the Hitchin......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Preliminary Sections
...Wickins [1918] P. 265. 177 Williams v. Williams [1963] 3 W.L.R. 215. 177 Willmott v. Barber (1800) 15 Ch D 96 185 Woolfenden v. Woolfenden [1948] P. 27. 177 Yaya v. Mogoga (1947) 12 W.A.C.A. 132. 152 Yesufu v. 0;o [1958] 3 F.S.C. 106. 258 ...
-
Cases referred to in 1967
...Wickins [1918] P. 265. 177 Williams v. Williams [1963] 3 W.L.R. 215. 177 Willmott v. Barber (1800) 15 Ch D 96 185 Woolfenden v. Woolfenden [1948] P. 27. 177 Yaya v. Mogoga (1947) 12 W.A.C.A. 132. 152 Yesufu v. 0;o [1958] 3 F.S.C. 106. 258 ...
-
OBAYEMI V. OBAYEMI
...his favour, the court has a general discretion to grant 5 or refuse a divorce. CASES REFERRED TO IN JUDGMENT: 1. Woolfenden v. Woolfenden [1948] P. 27. 2. Theodoropoulas v. Theodoropoulas [1963] 2 All E.R. 772 10 3. McTaggart v. McTaggart [1949] P. 94 [1948] 2 All E.R. 754. 4. Gollins v. Go......
-
The President and His Political Executives
...of Columbia in 1800,the entire record of the executive branch wassent in seven packing cases.4 Leonard D. White, The Federalists (NewYork, 1948), p. 27. 2750,000. By 1849, the bureau systemhad become sufficiently entrenched tolead Senator John M. Niles to declarethat the bureaus were alread......