WR v Disclosure and barring Service

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
JudgeJudge Jacobs
Neutral Citation[2024] UKUT 30  (AAC)
Published date22 March 2024
CourtUpper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
1
THE UPPER TRIBUNAL
(ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER)
UPPER TRIBUNAL CASE NO: UA-2022-001170-V
[2024] UKUT 30 (AAC)
WR V DISCLOSURE AND BARRING SERVICE
THE UPPER TRIBUNAL ORDERS that:
No one shall, without the consent of the Upper Tribunal, publish or reveal
the name or address of any of the following:
(a) WR, who is the Appellant in these proceedings;
(b) any other person mentioned in this decision, in the documents or
during a hearing;
or any information that would be likely to lead to the identification of any of
them or any member of their families in connection with these proceedings.
Any breach of this order is liable to be treated as a contempt of court and
may be punishable by imprisonment, fine or other sanctions under section
25 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. The maximum
punishment that may be imposed is a sentence of two years’ imprisonment
or an unlimited fine.
Decided following an oral hearing on 18 December 2023
Representatives
WR
Unison
Disclosure and Barring Service
Ashley Serr of counsel, instructed by DLA Piper
LLP
DECISION OF THE UPPER TRIBUNAL
On appeal from the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS from now on)
DBS Reference:
00946631490
Decision letter:
14 March 2022
(SVGA from now on):

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT