Wright on the demise of Ann Burrill otherwise Wallis, and Mary Burrill otherwise Wallis v Kemp

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date20 November 1789
Date20 November 1789
CourtCourt of the King's Bench

English Reports Citation: 100 E.R. 682

IN THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH

Wright on the demise of Ann Burrill otherwise Wallis, and Mary Burrill otherwise Wallis, against Kemp

wright on the demise of ann burrill otherwise wallis, and mary burrill otherwise wallis, against kemp. Friday, Nov. 20th, 1789. In order to effectuate the intention of the parties, the Court will construe the word "or" to mean "and " as well in a surrender of copyhold premises as in a will. In this ejectment which was tried at the last York Assizes, a verdict was taken for the plaintiff, subject to the opinion of this Court on the following case : Samuel Burrill, who was seized in fee according to the custom of the manor of Skipsea of the estate in question, on 1st February 1743 made a voluntary surrender of it to the use of himself for life, and from and after his decease to the use of Elizabeth his wife, during her widowhood ; and after his decease, and upon the marriage of Elizabeth, then to the use and behoof of William Wallis, son of Elizabeth, for his natural life; and from and after his decease to the use of the issue of his body (a) Vid. Tooke Hollitigworth, post, 5 vol. 215. 3T.R.471. WRIGHT V. KEMP 683 lawfully to be begotten; with a proviso that in case William Wallis should die in the lifetime of the surrenderor, or without issue of his body, then and thereupon all the surrendered premises should go to the right heirs of the surrenderor for ever. W. Wallis was the natural son of S. Burrill by E. Wallis, whom he afterwards married ; and he and Elizabeth Burrill both died in the life-time of the surrenderor; William Wallis left issue, the lessors of the plaintiff, who have been admitted tenants; and he bequeathed the tuition and guardianship of the persons and estates of the lessors of the plaintiff to his brother, J. Burrill, by will dated 25th April 1767, and died in the same year. S. Burrill died the 3d of April 1774. John, who was the eldest legitimate son of his father Samuel, was admitted tenant of the premises, as heir to his father, on 15th May 1775; under whom the defendant claims as a purchaser for a valuable consideration, though with notice of [471] the claim by Wallis's children, under the surrender in February 1743, and he has been also admitted. Lowndea for the plaintiff, after observing that the surrender ought to be construed so as to effectuate the intention of the parties consistently with the rules of law, contended that the limitation to the issue of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • The Marquis of Cholmondeley against Lord Clinton
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the King's Bench
    • 1 January 1819
    ...And in Ginger, dem. White, v. White (Willes, 348), it is said "Yerba intention! et non e contra debent inservire," Wright v. Kemp (3 T. R. 470), .Hodgson v. Bussey (2 Atk 89), [638] and Cartwright v. Wright (I Burr. 282), are to the same effect. And the Judges will, in order to satisfy the ......
  • Scanlan and Wife, Administratrix of Edmond Fitzmaurice, Deceased, v Sceals and Two Others
    • Ireland
    • Exchequer of Pleas (Ireland)
    • 11 June 1841
    ...Fire Insurance Company V. Macmoran 3Dow. 255. Everett V. DesboroughENR 5 Bing. 503. Huckman V. FerneyENR 3 M. & W.505. Wright V. KempENR 3 T. R. 470. Fowler V. PadgetENR 7 T. R. 514. Ross V. Bradshaw 1 W. Black. 312. Willis V. Poole Cited in Parke on Insur. 650. Everett V. DesboroughENR 5 B......
  • The Estate of Mary Regan and Others, Owners; Mary Murphy and Others, Petitioners
    • Ireland
    • Chancery Division (Ireland)
    • 28 February 1893
    ...Goldring v. Inwood 8 Jur. (N. S.) 206. Jenkins v. Quinchant 5 Ves. 596, note. Fairfield v. MorganUNK 2 B. & P. N. R. 38. Wright v. KempENR 3 T. R. 470. Champ v. ChampUNK 30 L. R. Ir. 72. Rawlins' Trusts (Suche v. Rawlins)ELR 45 Ch. D. 299. Goldring v. Inwood 8 Jur. (N. S.) 206. Marriage set......
  • O'Donnell v Ryan
    • Ireland
    • Court of Common Pleas (Ireland)
    • 3 May 1854
    ...Pleas. O'DONNELL and RYAN. Solly v. Forbes 4 B. Moore, 448. Framlingham v. BrandENR 3 Atk. 390. Wright v. KempENR 3 T. R. 470. White v. Supple 2 D. & W. 471. Moody v. ThurstonENR 1 Strange, 481. Moore v. Magrath Cowp. 9. Atkinson v. Pilsworth 1 Ridg. P. C. 461. Radnor v. Reeve B. & P. 391. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT