Wyatt v Kreglinger & Fernau

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1933
Year1933
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
24 cases
  • Marshall v N M Financial Management Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 16 June 1995
    ...that if he did not do so he would receive some benefit to which he would not otherwise be entitled: Wyatt v Kreglinger and FernauELR ((1933) 1 KB 793). It was also quite impossible for the company to justify proviso (i) as being reasonably required for the protection of some legitimate inte......
  • Courage Ltd v Crehan (Case C-453/99)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 12 November 2001
  • Tullett Prebon Plc and Others v BGC Brokers LP and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 18 March 2010
    ...be any doubt that proviso (i) is a restraint of trade. It had been well established since the decision of the Court of Appeal in Wyatt v Kreglinger and Fernau [1933] 1 K.B. 793 that there is no relevant difference between a contract that a person will not carry on a particular trade and a c......
  • IBM United Kingdom Holdings Ltd and Another v Stuart Dalgleish and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 20 February 2015
    ...the position in Vancouver Malt and Sake Brewing Co. Ltd. v. Vancouver Breweries Ltd. [1934] A.C. 181. It was also the position in Wyatt v. Kreglinger and Fernau [1933] 1 K.B. 793 where on the eve of his retirement an employee who otherwise had no entitlement to a pension was granted an ex g......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT