Wyatt v Kreglinger & Fernau

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1933
Date1933

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
26 cases
  • Marshall v N M Financial Management Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 16 June 1995
    ...organisation which at the relevant time regulated the sale of life assurance and similar financial products. Schedule 3Wyatt v Kreglinger and FernauELR ((1933) 1 KB 793). It was also quite impossible for the company to justify proviso (i) as being reasonably required for the protection of s......
  • Bull v Pitney-Bowes Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
    ...costs of the action. Declarations accordingly. Solicitors: Rollit, Sons & Haydon; Allen & Overy. [Reported by HOOSEN COOVADIA, ESQ49 T.L.R. 264, C.A. Per Thesiger J. It may be very much in the public interest that the services of experienced salesmen skilled in a particular techniqu......
  • Courage Ltd v Crehan (Case C-453/99)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 12 November 2001
  • Tullett Prebon Plc and Others v BGC Brokers LP and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 18 March 2010
    ...that proviso (i) is a restraint of trade. It had been well established since the decision of the Court of Appeal in Wyatt v Kreglinger and Fernau [1933] 1 K.B. 793 that there is no relevant difference between a contract that a person will not carry on a particular trade and a contract that ......
  • Get Started for Free