X City Council v MB, NB and MAB [FD]
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Family Division |
| Judgment Date | 13 February 2006 |
| Neutral Citation | [2006] EWHC 168 (Fam) |
| Date | 13 February 2006 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
39 cases
-
Westminster City Council v C and Others
...if it is not recognised in English law it will not be recognised by English public authorities.” 71 X City Council v MB, NB and MAB (by his Litigation Friend the Official Solicitor) has a number of similarities with the instant appeal. The subject of the proceedings, B was aged 25 and aut......
-
A London Local Authority v JH (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor (First Respondent) MH (Second Respondent)
...(Fam), [2007] 1 FLR 399, at paras [90]–[92], andX City Council v MB, NB and MAB (by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor) [2006] EWHC 168 (Fam), [2006] 2 FLR 968, at para [27]. The jurisdiction is to be invoked if, but only if, there is a demonstrated need to protect a vulnerable a......
-
London Borough of Tower Hamlets v NB
...it is ‘decision-specific’ (see PC & NC v City of York Council [2013] EWCA Civ 478 at paras. 31–35). 19 The approach in X City Council v MB (supra) strikes me as approaching the issue of consent in a way which is structured but not constrictive. It was revisited by Munby J in Local Auth......
-
R v C
...1 Cr App R 211 relied heavily upon the observations of Munby J when exercising the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court in Re MAB [2006] EWHC (Fam) 168 and Re MM [2007] EWHC (Fam) 2003, both decided before the Mental Capacity Act 2005 came into force. He expressed the view that the tes......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
The Court Of Protection - Recent Cases And Comments On Procedure (Part 1)
...to consent to sexual relations, the House of Lords also considered the judgment of Munby J (as he then was) in X City Council v MB [2006] EWHC 168 (Fam) which dealt with the common law test for capacity to consent to sexual relations. Baroness Hale said that she was 'far from sure' that the......
