X v Y (Employment: Sex Offender)

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Date2003
Year2003
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • X v Y (Employment: Sex Offender)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 28 May 2004
    ...a discretion to restrict reporting in a case involving "allegations of sexual misconduct." So far, the case has been listed and reported as X v Y, but, adopting the terminology used by the employment appeal tribunal in its judgment, I shall call the employee "the applicant" and the employer......
  • R (Hurst) v HM Coroner for Northern District London
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 July 2005
    ...a reply which argued that section 3 had been applied by the English courts in cases such as Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557 and X v Y [2004] EWCA Civ 662, where, because the respondent was not a public authority, the rights relied on were not directly enforceable in domestic law. ......
  • Copsey v WWB Devon Clays Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 July 2005
    ... ... [2004] EWCA Civ 550 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL (MR JUSTICE RIMER) Royal Courts of Justice Strand London, WC2 ... Lord Justice Ward ... Lord Justice ... ...
  • Turner v East Midlands Trains Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 November 2012
    ...test was itself compatible with Article 8. The Employment Tribunal set out at length extracts from the judgment of Lord Justice Mummery in X v Y [2004] ICR 1634 in which His Lordship analysed in considerable detail the effect of Article 8 on the law of unfair dismissal. The Tribunal emphasi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The Protection of Civil Liberties in the Workplace
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 69-4, July 2006
    • 1 July 2006
    ...recog-nised that at least for some Convention rights, including articles 8 and 14, there is5 [2004] EWCA Civ 662 [2004] ICR1634,CA.6 [2003] ICR1138,EAT.7Post O⁄ ce vFoley [2001] ICR 12 83, CA.8EgNeillLJ,MiddlebrookMushroomsLtd vTGWU [1993] IC R 612,62 0 CA.The Protection of Civil Liberties ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT