Yager v Fishman & Company and Teff & Teff
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1944 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Lie Hendri Rusli v Wong Tan and Molly Lim (a firm)
...omission is hardly ever likely to be viewed charitably. Commercial advice 61 The English Court of Appeal in Yager v Fishman & Co [1944] 1 All ER 552 unequivocally rejected any suggestion that the defendant solicitors were negligent in failing to advise a client that he ought to determine a ......
-
Karmjeet Singh Kandola v Mirza Solicitors LLP
...a duty to comply with accepted practice or by virtue of a legal duty to take that step specifically. 46 Mr. Wood also referred me to Yager v Fishman & Co [1944] 1 All ER 552 and Carradine Properties v DJ Freeman & Co [1999] Lloyd's Rep PN 48 in support of the proposition that the solicitor'......
-
Brook Properties (Birmingham) Ltd v Alton & Company (A Firm)
...EWHC 460 (Ch), [2015] PNLR 19. In the course of his judgment, Judge Cooke said this: "46 [Counsel for the defendant] also [cited] Yager v Fishman & Co [1944] 1 All E.R. 552 and Carradine Properties v DJ Freeman & Co [1999] Lloyd's Rep PN 48 in support of the proposition that the solicitor'......
-
Masons (A Firm)(Claimant/Part 20 Defendant) v Wd King Ltd and Another (Defendant/Part 20 Claimants)
...as a result of any breach of Condition 38. …" These are the main allegations. Mr Wilmot-Smith in opening referred to Yager v Fishman [1944] 1 All ER 552 at page 555F which shows that a solicitor is not retained to advise on business matters and to the judgment of Lightman J in Hurlingham Es......
Request a trial to view additional results