Yearworth and others v North Bristol NHS Trust

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Judgment Date04 February 2009
Neutral Citation[2009] EWCA Civ 37
Date04 February 2009

Court of Appeal

Before Lord Judge, Lord Chief Justice, Sir Anthony Clarke. Master of the Rolls and Lord Justice Wilson

Yearworth and Others
and
North Bristol NHS Trust
Supplier of sperm sample has property interest in it

A sample of sperm from a person undergoing chemotherapy, which a hospital stored in case he became infertile after the treatment, was that person's property and its loss or damage was capable of establishing a claim in negligence.

Further, where the hospital's storage was undertaken gratuitously in the sense that it was a bailee of the sperm, any breach of duty in its safe storage causing loss or damage entitled the owner to recover damages in bailment for psychiatric injury and/or mental distress.

The Court of Appeal so held in a reserved judgment when it allowed the appeal of the claimants, Jonathan Yearworth, James Denslow, Martin Lee, Paul Ritchie, Julie Smith, as executrix of Jeremy Michael Smith, and Christopher Waddleton, against the judgment of Judge Griggs in Exeter County Court on M arch 12, 2008, when he held, inter alia, on preliminary issues that the claimants' sperm samples were not owned by them, and that they were not entitled to damages for loss of or damage to the samples or in respect of psychiatric injury. The Court of Appeal remitted the case to the county court for determination of further factual matters.

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
17 cases
  • Richard Holdich V. Lothian Health Board
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 19 December 2013
    ...or female, intended for in vitro fertilisation as part of the subject's body, or possibly bodies in the case of unimplanted embryos? In Yearworth the Court of Appeal noticed the German law theory of the "functional unity" [eine funktionale einheit] of stored gametes with the living body. Th......
  • Natixis S.A. v Marex Financial
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 2 October 2019
    ...(as to the nature of a claim in bailment see East West Corpn v DKBS AF 1912 A/S [2003] QB 1509 at [24]–[32] and Yearworth v North Bristol NHS Trust [2010] QB 1 at [48]). Liability in bailment has been said to be sui generis and is separate from any liability in tort (and the measure of dama......
  • Kimathi and Others v The Foreign and Commonwealth Office
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 24 May 2018
    ...(1) – (2) below. 10 See (3) below. 11 Walkin v South Manchester Health Authority [1995] 4 All E.R. 132 at 139j. 12 Yearworth v North Bristol NHS Trust [2010] Q.B. 1 at para 23. The “not merely mental distress but a psychiatric injury, namely a mild or moderate depressive disorder” (para 10)......
  • Hocking v Director-General of the National Archives of Australia
    • Australia
    • High Court (Australia)
    • 29 May 2020
    ...Property Rights”, in Penner and Smith (eds), Philosophical Foundations of Property Law (2013) 219 at 233–234, discussing Yearworth v North Bristol NHS Trust [2010] QB 195 Leigh and Sillavan Ltd v Aliakmon Shipping Co Ltd [1986] AC 785 at 809, quoted in R G and T J Anderson Pty Ltd v Chambe......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Is human tissue 'property'? Jocelyn Edwards; Re the estate of the late Mark Edwards [2011] NSWSC 478
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 7 June 2011
    ...Justice Hulme was assisted by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales' decision in Yearworth and others v North Bristol NHS Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 37 which held that sperm samples can be categorised as property. In Yearworth, six men were diagnosed with cancer and, prior to undergoing treat......
  • Genetic Material As Property: Rethinking The Common Law View
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 13 June 2012
    ...rethinking. One of the recent cases reviewed by the court was the U.K. case of Jonathan Yearworth & Ors v. North Bristol NHS Trust, [2009] EWCA Civ 37. In this case, six men who had stored sperm samples sued when the liquid nitrogen in the tanks used to store the samples fell below the ......
17 books & journal articles
  • The ‘Chimera’ of Parenthood
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 84-3, May 2021
    • 1 May 2021
    ...(2019) 68 EHRR 20 at [60].85 [2011] 1 FLR 1883.86 See for example J. Herring,Medical Law and Ethics (Oxford: OUP,8th ed, 2020) ch 8.87 [2009] EWCA Civ 37; [2010] QB 1.88 M. Johnson, ‘A Biomedical Perspective on Parenthood’ in A. Bainham, S. Day Sclater and M.Richards (eds), What is a Parent......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Torts. Sixth Edition
    • 25 June 2020
    ...v Zhu, 2013 BCCA 352 .........................................................................348 Yearworth v North Bristol NHS Trust, [2009] 2 All ER 986 (CA)....................... 69 Yepremian v Scarborough General Hospital (1980), 28 OR (2d) 494, [1980] OJ No 3592 (CA) .......................
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Property
    • 5 August 2021
    ...19, 62 Yaxley v Gotts, [1999] EWCA Civ 3006, [2000] Ch 162 ................................... 227 Yearworth v North Bristol NHS Trust, [2009] EWCA Civ 37, [2010] QB 1 ........ 12 Yorkshire Railway Wagon Co v Maclure (1882), 21 Ch D 309 (CA) ..................111 Young v Hichens (1844), 6 Q......
  • Negligence: Basic Principles
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Torts. Sixth Edition
    • 25 June 2020
    ...It enacted the Damages (Asbestos-related Conditions) Scotland Act 2009 allowing liability for pleural plaques. 111 [2018] UKSC 18. 112 [2009] 2 All ER 986 (CA) [ Yearworth ]. 113 Yearworth has been followed in Canada. Human tissue, once removed from the body, has been characterized as perso......
  • Get Started for Free