Yetkin v Mahmood and another
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2011 |
| Year | 2011 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
The Queen (on the application of David Dillner) v Sheffield City Council Amey Hallam Highways Ltd (Interested Party)
...with visibility for drivers, it is liable in damages for injuries caused as a result; see Yetkin v Newham LBC [2010] EWCA Civ 776 [2011] QB 827 at [33] per Smith 26 There are also sanctions enforceable by the courts against a highway authority that does not keep the highway properly maint......
-
Paul Singh v The City of Cardiff Council
...failed to abate". 64 Although not referred to in submissions, the matter has been considered extensively by the Court of Appeal in Yetkin v Mahmood [2011] Q.B. 827. There Smith L.J., with whom Black L.J. and Laws L.J. agreed, considered that there would be liability at common law for hazard......
-
Demetrios Karpasitis v Hertfordshire County Council
...the safety of the highway will generally owe a duty of care to road users and if there is a breach of that duty liability will follow: Yetkin v Mahmood [2010] EWCA Civ 776 [2011] QB 827, [25]. There was no legal requirement that such act had to amount to an enticement, or that the Claiman......
-
Bowes v Highland Council
...Ltd [2007] CSOH 94 West Sussex County Council v Russell [2010] EWCA Civ 71; [2010] RTR 19 Yetkin v Mahmood [2010] EWCA Civ 776; [2011] QB 827; [2011] 2 WLR 1073; [2011] PTSR 1295; [2010] RTR 39 Textbooks etc referred to: Highland Council, Bridge Maintenance Programme for Sutherland 2005–201......
Request a trial to view additional results