York Corporation v Leetham (Henry) & Sons
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1924 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 cases
-
Fayed v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
...(1986) 61 TC 112 Ross v RossSC 1930 SC (HL) 1 Vestey v IRC (Nos 1 and 2)ELR [1980] AC 1148 York Corporation v Henry Leetham&Sons LtdELR [1924] 1 Ch 557 At advising on 31 May LORD JUSTICE CLERK'SOpinion Introduction[1] This is a petition for judicial review of a decision by the Commissioners......
-
Al-Fayed v Lord Advocate
...Service Unions ELR[1985] AC 374 Ross v Ross SC1930 SC(HL) 1 Vestey v IR Commrs ELR[1980] AC 1148 York Corp v Henry Leetham & Sons Ltd ELR[1924] 1 Ch 557 This was an application for judicial review of a decision by the Inland Revenue Commissioners in 2000 not to abide by the terms of a 1997 ......
-
Mohamed Abdel Moneim Ali Fayed+ali Ali Fayed+salah Eldin Ali Fayed For Judicial Review Of A Decision By The Commissioners Of Inland Revenue
...two cases which fell into that category, namely, Balfour v. Sharp (1833) 11 S. 784 and York Corporation v. Henry Leetham & Sons Limited [1924] 1 Ch. 557. However, the Lord Ordinary's statement of the law was not correct in the context of the exercise of discretionary powers. In the present ......
-
Fayed v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
...Whitney v IRCELR [1926] AC 37 Wilson v First County Trust Ltd (No 2)ELR [2004] 1 AC 816 York Corporation v Henry Leetham & Sons LtdELR [1924] 1 Ch 557 The cause called before the First Division, comprising the Lord President (Cullen), Lord Kirkwood and Lord MacLean for a hearing on the summ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
The rise, fall, and reform of the ultra vires doctrine
...the contract cannot be ratified because it could not have been authorized by the company. 7 York Corporation v Henry Leetham & Sons Ltd [1924] 1 Ch 557. See also Central Transportation Co v Pullman's Palace Car Co 139 US 24 60 (1890). 8 Central Transportation Co v Pullman's Palace Car Co su......