York v Casey
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1998 |
| Year | 1998 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
26 cases
-
Marks and Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd and Another
...these charges would in any event have been subject to apportionment just as this court had apportioned rent without those words in York v Casey [1998] 2 EGLR 25: see per Peter Gibson LJ at 28 A — B. He held that therefore there was an implied term for repayment as in the case of the Basic ......
-
Tanya Grand v Param Gill
...the new approach to the construction of a notice exercising a break clause in a lease which specified the wrong date of termination. In York v Casey [1998] 31 HLR 209 this Court accepted that the same approach to construction was relevant to a s.20 notice which contained inaccurate particu......
-
Burman v Mount Cook Land Ltd
...The principles reviewed and restated in the Mannai case were applied to the contents of a statutory notice by this Court in York v Casey [1998] 30 EG 110, [1998] 2 EGLR 25. The notice was to be served under section 20(1)(c) of the Housing Act 1988, in advance of the creation of a tenancy, w......
-
Captain Nigel Crighton Pease v Jeffrey William Carter
...require the restriction of background in this case do not apply to notices given pursuant to clauses in leases.” 18 In York v Casey (1999) 31 HLR 209 the landlords brought proceedings for possession of a property after serving notice under section 21 of the 1988 Act. The validity of that no......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Breaks And Apportionment Of Rent - A Ray Of Light For Tenants?
...In any event, the same outcome would have been reached if the lease had not included this wording following the judgment of York v Casey [1998] 2 EGLR 25. Taking into account the break notice served by M&S, was M&S required to pay the whole quarter's rent or only an apportionment of......
-
Breaks And Apportionment Of Rent; A Ray Of Light For Tenants?
...In any event, the same outcome would have been reached if the lease had not included this wording following the judgment of York v Casey [1998] 2 EGLR 25. Taking into account the break notice served by M&S, was M&S required to pay the whole quarter's rent or only an apportionment of......