Yorkshire Metropolitan Properties Ltd v Cooperative Retail Services Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1997
Year1997
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
  • Parbulk II A/S (Arbitration Claimant) v Heritage Maritime Ltd SA (Arbitration Defendant)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 8 Noviembre 2011
    ...against forfeiture (see Neuberger LJ in Thomas v Ken Thomas Ltd [2007] Bus L.R. 429 at 435; Neuberger J in Yorkshire Metropolitan Properties Ltd v Co-Operative Retail Services Ltd [2001] L. & T.R. 26 at 88; Sachs J in Segal Securities Ltd v Thoseby [1963] 1 QB 887 at 897). 2) The principl......
  • Greenwood Reversons Ltd v World Environment Foundation Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 6 Febrero 2008
    ...In so doing, he relied upon a passage at paragraph 91 in the judgment of Neuberger J (as he then was) in Yorkshire Metropolitan Properties Ltd v Co-operative Retail Services Ltd [2001] L&T R 26 as constituting the relevant test for waiver. Neither letter was “so unequivocal that when consid......
2 firm's commentaries
  • Does Demanding Rent Waive The Right To Forfeit? (Was Lord Neuberger Always Right?)
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 25 Enero 2022
    ...to assume that was correct, without deciding the point. In Yorkshire Metropolitan Properties Ltd. v Co-Operative Retail Services Ltd. [2001] L. & T.R. 26, Neuberger J. was prepared to proceed on the assumption that a demand for rent operated as a In Thomas v Ken Thomas Ltd. [2007] L. & T.R.......
  • Does Demanding Rent Waive The Right To Forfeit? (Was Lord Neuberger Always Right?)
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 25 Enero 2022
    ...to assume that was correct, without deciding the point. In Yorkshire Metropolitan Properties Ltd. v Co-Operative Retail Services Ltd. [2001] L. & T.R. 26, Neuberger J. was prepared to proceed on the assumption that a demand for rent operated as a In Thomas v Ken Thomas Ltd. [2007] L. & T.R.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT