Yorkshire Railway Wagon Company v Maclure

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1881
Date1881
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
46 cases
  • Kueen Lai Properties Sdn. Bhd. v. ACE Credit (M) Sdn. Bhd.
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 3 January 2023
    ...to create. But one thing, I think, is clear in legal principle, morality and the authorities (see Yorkshire Railway Wagon Co v Maclure (1882) 21 Ch D 309, CA and Stoneleigh Finance Ltd v Phillips [1965] 2 QB 537), that for acts or documents to be a ‘sham’, with whatever legal consequences f......
  • Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock (No. 3)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... May 29, ... UNGOED-THOMAS J ... Company - Director - Fiduciary dufy to company - Use of moneys in ... v. Gibb F7 ; Lewis v. Great Western Railway Co. F8 ; In re Barrow-in-Furness & Northern Counties Land and Investment Co. F9 ; Yorkshire Railway Wagon Co. v. Maclure F10 ; In re New Mashonaland ... ...
  • Shalson and Others v Russo and Others; Mimran and Another (Part 20 Claimants)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 11 July 2003
    ...to create. But one thing, I think, is clear in legal principle, morality and the authorities (see Yorkshire Railway Wagon Co v Maclure (1882) 21 Ch D 309 and Stoneleigh Finance Ltd v Phillips [1965] 2 QB 537), that for acts or documents to be a 'sham', with whatever legal consequences foll......
  • Raftland Pty Ltd as Trustee of the Raftland Trust v Commissioner of Taxation
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 22 May 2008
    ...J; [1993] HCA 30. 79 [1962] AC 600. 80 [1962] AC 600 at 634. 81 [1967] 2 QB 786 at 802 citing Yorkshire Railway Wagon Co v Maclure (1882) 21 Ch D 309 and Stoneleigh Finance Ltd v Phillips [1965] 2 QB 537. See also W T Ramsay Ltd v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1982] AC 300 at 82 See eg MacN......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Property
    • 5 August 2021
    ...227 Yearworth v North Bristol NHS Trust, [2009] EWCA Civ 37, [2010] QB 1 ........ 12 Yorkshire Railway Wagon Co v Maclure (1882), 21 Ch D 309 (CA) ..................111 Young v Hichens (1844), 6 QB 606 ................................................................. 20–21 Your Response Ltd......
  • Security Interests
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Property
    • 5 August 2021
    ...as security, they executed a deed that transferred title to the machinery 29 See, for example, Yorkshire Railway Wagon Co v Maclure (1882), 21 Ch D 309 (CA); Westcoast Leasing Ltd v Westcoast Communications Ltd (1980), 22 BCLR 285 (SC). 30 See, for example, CIBC Mortgage Corp v Vasquez , 20......