Young and Others v Robson Rhodes (A Firm) and Another
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 1999 |
Year | 1999 |
Date | 1999 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
M (M) v M (GI)
...discussed and applied in the several authorities to which I have been referred, namely, in chronological order: Young v. Robson Rhodes [1999] 3 All ER 524 (Laddie J); Davies v, Davies [2001] FLR 39 (CA); Newman v. Phillips [1999] WASC 171, [1999] Western Australian Reports 309 (Steytler J);......
-
Marks and Spencer Plc v Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer (A Firm)
...see Re Baron Investments (Holdings) Ltd [2001] 1 BCLC 2722 (a conflict of interest, or double employment, case), and cf Laddie J in Young v. Robson Rhodes [1999] 3 All ER 524 (a confidentiality/Chinese Wall case). 16 Most of the cases refer to the problem in the context of conflicting inter......
-
Glencairn IP Holdings Ltd v Product Specialities Inc. (t/a Final Touch)
...the characteristics of an information barrier set out by Lord Millett in Bolkiah the judge had earlier noted that in Young v Robson Rhodes [1999] 3 All ER 524, Laddie J had said that Lord Millett's statement that an effective barrier needs to be part of the organisational structure of the f......
- Re Z (Restraining solicitors from Acting)
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
English Court Refuses To Grant An Order Restraining A Firm Of Solicitors From Acting
...the Judge considered that an effective information barrier needed to be in place. However, applying Young v Robson Rhodes (a firm) [1999] 3 All ER 524, the Judge did not consider that it mattered whether the information barrier was an established part of the organisational structure of the ......
3 books & journal articles
-
Conflicts of Interest in Financial Services: Judicial Development and Regulatory Rules
...infra section on ‘e Coexsistence of Fiduciary Law and Regulatory Rules’.94. [1999] 2 AC 222, see infra for discussion of the case.95. [1999] 3 All ER 524, see infra for discussion of the case.96. Hansard HL, 9 May 2000, cols 1405-9.97. Ibid., col 421.98. [1999] 2 AC 222.99. (1990) 77 DLR (......
-
Judging Democracy: The New Politics of the High Court of Australia.
...Andrew Mitchell, `Chinese Walls in Bmnei: Prince Jefri Bolkiah v KPMG' (1999) 22 University of New South Wales Law Review 243. (14) [1999] 3 All ER 524 (`Robson (15) These are listed by country in the index. (16) Hollander and Salzedo, above n 3, 3-5. (17) Ibid 12, 97. (18) Ibid 3, citing B......
-
Predators and the Public Interest — the ‘Big Four’ and Multi–Disciplinary Practices
...services of the kind which were provided to Prince Jefri had to be treated in the same way as asolicitor. See Bolkiah 234.161 [1999] 3 All ER 524.162 Ibid at 539.163 See, for example, City Disputes Panel, Review of Conflicts and Duties in Relation to ConfidentialInformation (London, April 2......