Young and Others v Robson Rhodes (A Firm) and Another

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1999
Year1999
Date1999
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • Glencairn IP Holdings Ltd v Product Specialities Inc. (t/a Final Touch)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 7 Mayo 2020
    ...In considering the characteristics of an information barrier set out by Lord Millett in Bolkiah the judge had earlier noted that in Young v Robson Rhodes [1999] 3 All ER 524, Laddie J had said that Lord Millett's statement that an effective barrier needs to be part of the organisational st......
  • M (M) v M (GI)
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 18 Diciembre 2014
    ...discussed and applied in the several authorities to which I have been referred, namely, in chronological order: Young v. Robson Rhodes [1999] 3 All ER 524 (Laddie J); Davies v, Davies [2001] FLR 39 (CA); Newman v. Phillips [1999] WASC 171, [1999] Western Australian Reports 309 (Steytler J);......
  • Marks and Spencer Plc v Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer (A Firm)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 2 Junio 2004
    ...see Re Baron Investments (Holdings) Ltd [2001] 1 BCLC 2722 (a conflict of interest, or double employment, case), and cf Laddie J in Young v. Robson Rhodes [1999] 3 All ER 524 (a confidentiality/Chinese Wall case). 16 Most of the cases refer to the problem in the context of conflicting inter......
  • Re Z (Restraining solicitors from Acting)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • English Court Refuses To Grant An Order Restraining A Firm Of Solicitors From Acting
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 30 Agosto 2019
    ...the Judge considered that an effective information barrier needed to be in place. However, applying Young v Robson Rhodes (a firm) [1999] 3 All ER 524, the Judge did not consider that it mattered whether the information barrier was an established part of the organisational structure of the ......
3 books & journal articles
  • Conflicts of Interest in Financial Services: Judicial Development and Regulatory Rules
    • Jamaica
    • Risky Business: Perspectives on Corporate Misconduct Part One
    • 21 Julio 2010
    ...infra section on ‘e Coexsistence of Fiduciary Law and Regulatory Rules’.94. [1999] 2 AC 222, see infra for discussion of the case.95. [1999] 3 All ER 524, see infra for discussion of the case.96. Hansard HL, 9 May 2000, cols 1405-9.97. Ibid., col 421.98. [1999] 2 AC 222.99. (1990) 77 DLR (......
  • Judging Democracy: The New Politics of the High Court of Australia.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 26 No. 1, April 2002
    • 1 Abril 2002
    ...Andrew Mitchell, `Chinese Walls in Bmnei: Prince Jefri Bolkiah v KPMG' (1999) 22 University of New South Wales Law Review 243. (14) [1999] 3 All ER 524 (`Robson (15) These are listed by country in the index. (16) Hollander and Salzedo, above n 3, 3-5. (17) Ibid 12, 97. (18) Ibid 3, citing B......
  • Predators and the Public Interest — the ‘Big Four’ and Multi–Disciplinary Practices
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 65-6, November 2002
    • 1 Noviembre 2002
    ...services of the kind which were provided to Prince Jefri had to be treated in the same way as asolicitor. See Bolkiah 234.161 [1999] 3 All ER 524.162 Ibid at 539.163 See, for example, City Disputes Panel, Review of Conflicts and Duties in Relation to ConfidentialInformation (London, April 2......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT