Youth v R

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1945
Date1945
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 cases
  • Neoh Bean Chye and Another; PP
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • Invalid date
  • R. v. Violette (J.J.) et al., 2008 BCSC 665
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 28 May 2008
    ...this is a matter of discretion for the Judge at the trial. The Court so stated the law in this very case, and quite recently in YOUTH, [1945] W.N. 27, the Judicial Committee said that the question of joint or several trials had always been left to the discretion of the presiding Judge. The ......
  • Bellemore v Tasmania
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of Tasmania
    • 21 December 2006
    ...of evidence admissible against one but not another or others does not necessarily put a fair trial at risk. In Youth v The King (1945) WN 27, the appellant and his wife were jointly tried for murder and found guilty. Part of the evidence against the wife was a statement in writing made out ......
  • Public Prosecutor v Neoh Bean Chye and Another
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT