Immigration in UK Law
R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...... of State does not accept that removal would violate Mr Razgar's rights under article 8, and has certified under section 72(2)(a) of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 that the claim is manifestly unfounded. The consequence of that certification, if it stands, is to preclude any appeal by Mr ......
ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...... United Kingdom will also have to leave? There is, of course, no power to remove or deport a person who is a United Kingdom citizen: see Immigration Act 1971, section 3(5) and (6). They have a right of abode in this country, which means that they are free to live in, and to come and go into and ......
Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Abu-Qulbain v Same; Kashmiri v Same
...... 2 These two appeals have been heard together. They raise a common question on the decision-making role or function of appellate immigration authorities (adjudicators, the Immigration Appeal Tribunal, immigration judges) when deciding appeals, on Convention grounds, against refusal of ......
- R (on the Application of MA (Pakistan) and Others) v Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) and Another
The Secretary of State for the Home Department v SS (Congo) and Others
......  EWCA Civ 387 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE UPPER TRIBUNAL (IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER) FIRST TIER TRIBUNAL Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL . Before: . Lord Justice ......
MF (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for The Home Department
...... Case No: C5/2013/0398 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE UPPER TRIBUNAL (IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE STOREY & UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE COKER DA009162010 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, ......
Devaseelan v Secretary of State for the Home Department
... . .  UKIAT 702 IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL . Before: . Mr C. M. G. Ockelton (Deputy President) . Mr D. K. Allen . Mr P. R. Moulden . . ......
R (Agyarko) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...... Secretary of State concluded that the appellant did not qualify for leave to remain under the applicable provisions of Appendix FM to the Immigration Rules ("the Rules"), and that, applying the Immigration Directorate Instructions, "Family Members Under the Immigration Rules, Section FM 1.0, ......
R (Walumba Lumba and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...... Rabinder Singh QC . Elizabeth Prochaska . (Instructed by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP) . . Intervener (Bail for Immigration Detainees) . Michael Fordham QC . Graham Denholm . (Instructed by Allen & Overy LLP) . LORD DYSON . Introduction . ......
KO (Nigeria) and Others v Secretary of State for theHome Department
...... as to the treatment of “qualifying children” and their parents, under the statutory regime contained in Part 5A of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. The fourth ( AP (Sri Lanka) ) raises a related issue under the Rules. . . 2 Part 5A, headed “Article 8 of the ......
See all results