Immigration in UK Law

  • R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • House of Lords
    • 17 June 2004
    ... ... of State does not accept that removal would violate Mr Razgar's rights under article 8, and has certified under section 72(2)(a) of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 that the claim is manifestly unfounded. The consequence of that certification, if it stands, is to preclude any appeal by Mr ... ...
  • ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • Supreme Court
    • 01 February 2011
    ... ... United Kingdom will also have to leave? There is, of course, no power to remove or deport a person who is a United Kingdom citizen: see Immigration Act 1971, section 3(5) and (6). They have a right of abode in this country, which means that they are free to live in, and to come and go into and ... ...
  • Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Abu-Qulbain v Same; Kashmiri v Same
    • House of Lords
    • 21 March 2007
    ... ... 2 These two appeals have been heard together. They raise a common question on the decision-making role or function of appellate immigration authorities (adjudicators, the Immigration Appeal Tribunal, immigration judges) when deciding appeals, on Convention grounds, against refusal of ... ...
  • Devaseelan v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • Immigration Appeals Tribunal
    • 13 March 2002
    ... ... Mr C. M. G. Ockelton (Deputy President) ... Mr D. K. Allen ... Mr P. R. Moulden ... IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL Devaseelan (Second Appeals — ECHR — Extra-Territorial Effect) Sri Lanka * DETERMINATION AND ... ...
  • R (Walumba Lumba and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • Supreme Court
    • 23 March 2011
    ... ... Rabinder Singh QC ... Elizabeth Prochaska ... (Instructed by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP) ... Intervener (Bail for Immigration Detainees) ... Michael Fordham QC ... Graham Denholm ... (Instructed by Allen & Overy LLP) ... LORD DYSON ... ...
  • R (Agyarko) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • Supreme Court
    • 22 February 2017
    ... ... Secretary of State concluded that the appellant did not qualify for leave to remain under the applicable provisions of Appendix FM to the Immigration Rules ("the Rules"), and that, applying the Immigration Directorate Instructions, "Family Members Under the Immigration Rules, Section FM 1.0, ... ...
  • R (on the Application of MA (Pakistan) and Others) v Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) and Another
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 07 July 2016
  • The Secretary of State for the Home Department v SS (Congo) and Others
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 23 April 2015
    ... ... C5/2014/0703, C5/2014/3322, C5/2014/3324 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE UPPER TRIBUNAL (IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER) FIRST TIER TRIBUNAL Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL (Transcript of the Handed Down ... ...
  • KO (Nigeria) and Others v Secretary of State for theHome Department
    • Supreme Court
    • 24 October 2018
    ... ... as to the treatment of “qualifying children” and their parents, under the statutory regime contained in Part 5A of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. The fourth ( AP (Sri Lanka) ) raises a related issue under the Rules ... 2 Part 5A, headed “Article 8 of the ECHR: ... ...
  • HH v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa
    • Supreme Court
    • 20 June 2012
    ... ... Their mother had an "appalling" immigration history. She had made three unsuccessful applications for asylum, one in her own name and two in false identities. Because of this she had twice been ... ...
  • See all results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT