Industrial Relations in UK Law

Leading Cases
  • Universe Tankships Inc. of Monrovia v International Transport Workers Federation (Marine)
    • House of Lords
    • 01 Abr 1982

  • National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers v Serco Ltd (trading as Serco Docklands)
    • Court of Appeal
    • 04 Mar 2011

    I do not think this is now a legitimate approach, if it ever was. In my judgment the legislation should simply be construed in the normal way, without presumptions one way or the other. Indeed, as far as the 1992 Act is concerned, the starting point it that it should be given a "likely and workable construction", as Lord Bingham of Cornhill put it in P v National Association of Schoolmasters/ Union of Women Teachers [2003] ICR 386, para.7.

  • Secretary of State for Employment v ASLEF (No. 2)
    • Court of Appeal
    • 19 May 1972

    If he, with the others, takes steps wilfully to disrupt the undertaking, to produce chaos so that it will not run as it should, then each one who is a party to those steps is guilty of a breach of his contract. It is no answer for any one of them to say "I am only obeying the rule book", or "I am not bound to do more than a 40-hour week". Wages are to be paid for services rendered, not for producing deliberate chaos.

  • National Coal Board v Ridgway
    • Court of Appeal
    • 16 Dic 1986

    It seems reasonably clear that the phrase "as an individual" was included in section 53 of the Employment Protection Act 1975 (which was the forerunner of section 23 of the Act of 1978) to exclude from the ambit of the right conferred on employees by that section conduct of the kind found in Post Office v. Crouch [1974] 1 W.L.R.89. Nevertheless it was argued that any discrimination there was against the union and not Mr. Crouch personally.

  • Post Office v Crouch
    • House of Lords
    • 11 Dic 1973

    But the Industrial Relations Act is of a very different character. It creates rights, as in section 5, but breaches of these rights are not torts—they are only unfair industrial practices. A person alleging an unfair industrial practice cannot bring an action: he can only make a complaint to an Industrial Tribunal. The majority of the members of an Industrial Tribunal are not lawyers. The Tribunal does not give a remedy as of right. Under section 106 it

  • Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service
    • House of Lords
    • 22 Nov 1984

    By "irrationality" I mean what can by now be succinctly referred to as "Wednesbury unreasonableness" ( Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd. v. Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 K.B. 223). It applies to a decision which is so outrageous in its defiance of logic or of accepted moral standards that no sensible person who had applied his mind to the question to be decided could have arrived at it.

  • Johnson v Unisys Ltd
    • House of Lords
    • 22 Mar 2001

    In my opinion, all the matters of which Mr Johnson complains in these proceedings were within the jurisdiction of the industrial tribunal. His most substantial complaint is of financial loss flowing from his psychiatric injury which he says was a consequence of the unfair manner of his dismissal. Such loss is a consequence of the dismissal which may form the subject-matter of a compensatory award.

See all results
Books & Journal Articles
See all results
Law Firm Commentaries
See all results