Due Process in UK Law

  • Jaroo v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
    • Privy Council
    • 04 Febrero 2002
    ... ... rights under section 4(a) and section 4(b) had been infringed because he had been deprived of the enjoyment of his property without due process of law and because he had not been afforded protection under the law ... 9 Chapter 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of Trinidad and ... ...
  • Thomas and Another v Baptiste and Others
    • Privy Council
    • 17 Marzo 1999
    ... ... of the individual to life, liberty, security of the person and enjoyment of property and the right not to be deprived thereof "except by due process of law" (section 4(a)). It also prohibits the imposition of "cruel and unusual treatment or punishment" (section 5(2)(b)). Their Lordships observe ... ...
  • Neville Lewis and Others v Attorney General of Jamaica and Another
    • Privy Council
    • 12 Septiembre 2000
    ... ... Each further contended that his execution would violate (a) his right not to be deprived of his life save by due process of law contrary to section 13(a) and section 14(1) of the Constitution, (b) his right to the protection of the law under section 13(a) and (c) his ... ...
  • R v Horseferry Road Magistrates Court ex parte Bennett (A.P.)
    • House of Lords
    • 24 Junio 1993
    ... ... The police, after consulting with the Crown Prosecution Service, decided not to request the return of the appellant through the extradition process. The affidavit of Detective Sergeant Martin Davies of the Metropolitan Police of New Scotland Yard deposes as follows: "I originally ... ...
  • Pratt et Al v Attorney General et Al
    • Privy Council
    • 02 Noviembre 1993
    ... ... , would involve delay measured in years, rather than in months, it might be argued that the taking of the condemned man's life was not 'by due process of law'." ... 11 And as was asserted by Lord Templeman in Bell v. D.P.P. [1985] A.C. 937 where at page 950 he said:- ... ...
  • Flannery and Another v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd, trading as Colleys Professional Services
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 18 Febrero 1999
    ... ... 17We make the following general comments on the duty to give reasons: (1) The duty is a function of due process, and therefore of justice. Its rationale has two principal aspects. The first is that fairness surely requires that the parties—especially the ... ...
  • R (National Association of Health Stores and Another) v Secretary of State for Health
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 Febrero 2005
    ... ... 6 On the second issue Crane J held that the consultation process under the Medicines Act, but not under the Food Safety Act, was flawed by the omission of the possibility of requiring warning labelling. But he ... ...
  • Connelly v DPP
    • House of Lords
    • 21 Abril 1964
    ... ... But I think there must always be a residual discretion to prevent anything which savours of abuse of process ... 5 As regards the present appeal I think that the course which this case has taken was in accord with existing practice, and I would therefore ... ...
  • English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 Abril 2002
    ... ... He made the following comments on the general duty to give reasons: "(1) The duty is a function of due process, and therefore of justice. Its rationale has two principal aspects. The first is that fairness surely requires that the parties especially the losing ... ...
  • Gordon v Brock
    • Court of Session (Inner House - First Division)
    • 13 Noviembre 1838
    ... ... process of multiplepoinding at their instance against the representatives of Alexander and Neil M'Callum, in order to be disposed of as the Court shall ... ...
  • See all results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT