Sub Judice in UK Law

  • Wallersteiner v Moir
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 May 1974
    ... ... He uses any means to achieve his end with no regard for truth or accuracy ... 53 4 THE SUB JUDICE POINT ... 54 Once having issued a writ for libel against Mr. Moir, Dr. Wallersteiner put it into his service. By means of it, he tried hard to stop ... ...
  • Attorney General v Times Newspapers Ltd
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 February 1973
    ... ... 31 Nevertheless, I hope I may say this without giving offence: It is desirable that the convention of Parliament as to matters sub judice should, so far as possible, be the same as the law administered in the Courts. The object of each is the same -to prevent prejudice to pending ... ...
  • Goldsmith v Sperrings Ltd
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 23 February 1977
    ... ... A "gagging writ" initiate's litigation in which the issues raised will come under the umbrella of the sub judice rule and does so for the sole purpose of removing those issues from the sphere of public discussion. The plaintiff's writs against the subordinate ... ...
  • Pickin v British Railways Board
    • House of Lords
    • 30 January 1974
    ... ... and the courts have each been astute to respect the sphere of action and the privileges of the other—Parliament, for example, by its sub judice rule, the courts by taking care to exclude evidence which might amount to infringement of parliamentary privilege (for a recent example, see Dingle ... ...
  • Suisse Atlantique Société d'Armement Maritime S.A. v N.v Rotterdamsche Kolen Centrale (Silvretta.)
    • House of Lords
    • 31 March 1966
    ... ... made currently aware of the excessive delays in port; they had already sailed away once—I say nothing about that for it is is still sub judice —but it was for the owners, knowing of the delays, to make up their minds whether to sail away again. They did not do so and with full knowledge of ... ...
  • Woolwich Equitable Building Society v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
    • House of Lords
    • 20 July 1992
    ... ... , and the pending of the action itself, who knew and realised that the right of the defendants to receive the money was at the moment sub judice, and indeed on the point of coming before this court for decision. What would that hypothetical person have thought about it? In my judgment, he ... ...
  • Secretary of State for Employment v ASLEF (No. 2)
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 19 May 1972
    ... ... Pending the decision of the Court, the matter is sub judice and his action is unable to be discussed. It is only after action has been taken that the matter may be raised in Parliament. So the Courts must ... ...
  • Hunter and Others v Chief Constable of West Midlands
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 17 January 1980
    ... ... These related only to what happened after the men were received at the prison. Not beforehand because that was sub judice ... Mr. Owen reported on the 13th May, 1975. His report has not been disclosed ... 20 9th June, 1975 – 15th August, ... ...
  • R v Chaytor and Others
    • Supreme Court
    • 01 December 2010
    ... ... 57 On 8 February 2010 the Speaker made a statement to the House about the application of the sub judice rule in relation to the prosecutions of the three defendants, in the following terms. "I wish to make a statement to the House about the ... ...
  • Schering Chemicals Ltd v Falkman Ltd
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 January 1981
    ... ... 32 "At Thames, we have no anxiety at all about the issue of sub judice…I have taken particular care to relegate the issue of liability to a position where it does not dominate the film, nor does the film have to ... ...
  • See all results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT