R v A (A)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judge | LORD JUSTICE MAURICE KAY |
Judgment Date | 05 March 2009 |
Neutral Citation | [2009] EWCA Crim 513 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
Docket Number | No. 2008/05068/B1 |
Date | 05 March 2009 |
To continue reading
Request your trial7 cases
-
R v D and Others
...that we have been provided with a complete encyclopedia of every relevant decision and nor would it be possible. 13 We were referred to R v Weir [2006] 1 Cr. App. R 19, page 303. There the charge was indecent assault of a 10-year-old school friend of the daughter of the defendant's girlfrie......
-
Peter Toner v R
...nexus existed to bring the charges within Rule 9 even offences separated by a period of 9 years could be said to form a series. 6 In R v C, The Times February 4, 1993 the offences were separated by 11 years but were each sexual offences against the same victim (the defendant's daughter). Si......
-
The State v Harripersad
...is wider than criminal offending, and that these definitions do not require a conviction. But what about temporal considerations? 25 In R v. A [2009] E.W.C.A. Crim 513 the appellant was convicted of rape, indecent assault and taking an indecent photograph of a child. At his trial, the judge......
-
R v Allan Richards
...which is relevant to a jury's consideration of allegations of earlier offending: see R v Adenusi [2006] EWCA Crim 1059 and R v A [2009] EWCA Crim 513. 78 In the circumstances of this case, the judge was in our view correct to conclude that the evidence relating to count 45 was capable of ......
Request a trial to view additional results