AA (Non-Arab Darfuris – relocation)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeSenior Immigration Judge Allen
Judgment Date04 November 2009
Neutral Citation[2009] UKAIT 56
CourtAsylum and Immigration Tribunal
Date04 November 2009

[2009] UKAIT 56

Asylum and Immigration Tribunal

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

Before

SENIOR IMMIGRATION JUDGE Allen

SENIOR IMMIGRATION JUDGE Lane

Between
AA
Appellant
and
The Secretary of State for the Home Department
Respondent
Representation:

For the Appellant: Ms S McEwen, Legal Representative, Refugee and Migrant Justice

For the Respondent: Mr E Tufan, Home Office Presenting Officer

AA (Non-Arab Darfuris — relocation) Sudan CG

All non-Arab Darfuris are at risk of persecution in Darfur and cannot reasonably be expected to relocate elsewhere in Sudan. HGMO (Relocation to Khartoum) Sudan CG [2006] UKAIT 00062is no longer to be followed, save in respect of the guidance summarised at (2) and (6) of the headnote to that case.

DETERMINATION AND REASONS
1

The appellant is a citizen of Sudan. He appealed to an Immigration Judge against the Secretary of State's decision on 8 September 2008 to remove him as an illegal entrant from the United Kingdom.

2

Little more need be said about the Immigration Judge's determination, given that it was successfully challenged and on 16 March 2009 a Senior Immigration Judge ordered a full second stage reconsideration hearing. A copy of that determination is annexed hereto.

3

The second stage reconsideration took place before us on 4 November 2009. Ms S McEwen of Refugee and Migrant Justice appeared on behalf of the appellant. Mr E Tufan appeared on behalf of the Secretary of State.

4

It was common ground that the appeal fell to be allowed. The UK Border Agency produced an Operational Guidance Note (OGN) on Sudan on 2 November 2009. At paragraph 3.8.9 we find the following:

“3.8.9 Ordinary non-Arab Darfuris are not thought to be subject to systematic persecution outside Darfur and the courts have found that it is not unduly harsh to expect them to internally relocate to Khartoum. However, those decisions predated the developments and reports referred to at paragraph 3.9.4 to 3.9.7 below, and restrictions on the operations of NGOs – a key source of country of origin information on Sudan – have meant that we have been unable to obtain sufficient reliable information to be able to assess accurately whether there is a continued heightened risk to non-Arab Darfuris in Khartoum. In light of the fact that we do not yet have sufficient information to allay the concerns raised in the reports, case owners should not argue that non-Arab Darfuris can relocate internally within Sudan.

3.8.10 Conclusion. All non-Arab Darfuris, regardless of their political or other affiliations, are at real risk of persecution in Darfur and internal relocation elsewhere in Sudan is not currently to be relied upon....

To continue reading

Request your trial
85 cases
  • ALJ and A, B and C’s Application
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Northern Ireland)
    • 14 August 2013
    ...Darfuris should not be returned to Sudan nor was there any reference to the decision in AA v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKAIT 00056 given on 4 November 2009. There is reference at paragraph 3.3.5 (62) to UK Border Agency country of origin information report, April 201......
  • R S v First-Tier Tribunal Secretary of State for the Home Department (Interested Party)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 4 July 2012
    ...and who do not fall within the exclusion clauses will therefore qualify for asylum." 18 In AA (Non-Arab Darfuris – Relocation) Sudan CG [2009] UKAIT 00056, the Tribunal made reference to these paragraphs, and to the evidence which underpinned them, in arriving at the conclusion that all per......
  • CM (EM Country Guidance: Disclosure: Zimbabwe)
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 5 October 2012
    ...Darfuris in Khartoum that the AIT was able to promptly vary previous Country Guidance in AA (Non-Arab Darfuris-relocation) (Sudan) CG [2009] UKAIT 0056. 47 Nevertheless, the respondent's duty to act fairly and not mislead is supplemented by the power of the Tribunal to issue specific direct......
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2020-09-01, [2020] UKUT 269 (IAC) (KAM (Nuba – return) (CG))
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 1 September 2020
    ...First, the Nuba are treated in the same way as non-Arab Darfuris which, the CG cases of AA (Non-Arab Darfuris – relocation) Sudan CG [2009] UKAIT 00056 and MM (Darfuris) Sudan CG [2015] UKUT 000010 (IAC) recognise, are at risk on return. Secondly, the evidence from the witnesses and backgro......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT