Aglionby v Cohen

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Year1955
Date1955

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Government of the State of Perak and Others, The; Sidek bin Haji Muhamad and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • Invalid date
  • McPhail v Persons, Names Unknown; Bristol Corporation v Ross
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 24 May 1973
    ...hand, see Harris v. Austen (1616) 1 Rolls at page 213 by Chief Justice Coke; Lacy v. Berry (1659) 2 Siderfin at page 155/6; Aglionby v. Cohen (1955) 1 Q. B. 558. 14Seeing that the owner could take possession at once without the help of the Courts, it is plain that, when he does come to the ......
  • R (Sacupima) v Newham London Borough Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 23 November 2000
  • Haniff v Robinson
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 9 June 1992
    ...but this may now be confined to cases where nobody is lawfully in residence." 24 The passage refers to two authorities, Aglionby v. Cohen [1955] 1 QB 558 and Clifton Securities Ltd. v. Huntley and Others [1948] 2 All ER 283. We have been referred to those authorities. They dealt with cases ......
  • Get Started for Free