Alice Harris v White

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1662
Date01 January 1662
CourtCourt of the King's Bench

English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 285

King's Bench Division

Alice Harris
and
White

[81] alice harris versus white. Alice Harris libel en 1'Ecclesiastical Court pur slanderous parols, c^ White dit, scil. (^ el ad children devant el fuit marrye. Et pur c defamation le Arch-deacon de Dorchester article versus White, sur uu canon fait en le temps H. 3. de inducer penance pur ceux parols, & sentence fuit done per le official versus White; de c sentence il appeale al Arches ob gravamen. A. H. vint eins, & mit adicofi al marriage, cjj est admit, & sentence don pur le plaintiff, & costs done, & c fuit 12 October, 21 Jac. apr le relation del pardon de c sentence, le defendant appeale al delegates purc^ le primer sentence des Arches fuit suspend, & le principal case est pardon, les commissioners delegates out reverse le sentence, & done sentence, ^ les additions, ou supplements sont encounter ley. Et A. H. est condemne en costs. Et sur cest matter Noy move pur un prohibition, cest fuit est meerment ground sur un canon, c^ le party poit reclayme les parols, & undergoe penance sil persist. Et quaud un fuit est meremet pro salute animaB, & ad corrigendos mores, que est pardon p le general pardon, & c est agree en Hall's case, 5 liep. Mes fuit object, c^ les costs ue sont pardon, & discharge ; mes c fuit uu question en Dyer, si un soit sue en 1'Ecclesiastical Court, & la eat sentence de deprivation done versus luy, & est un auter institute, & induct in son lieu; ore si le second person serra remove p le general pardon, fuit le question, & fuit agree, q^ serra: & en Pa/uglum's case, un disseisin fuit; et breve d'entry, en le quibus port...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Beaver Marine (Pty) Ltd v Wuest
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...as occurred in the present case. The E Monica S (supra at 749D-E); Admiralty Rules, Order Vr 16 (Roscoe (op cit at 301)); Halsbury 1st ed vol lat 81 para 152; Vice-Admiralty Rule 29. The statement in Bamford The La.w of Shipping and Carria,ge 2nd ed at 141 that the claimant in Admiralty pro......
  • Lane v Cotton and Sir Thomas Franklin. in B. R
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the King's Bench
    • 1 January 1792
    ...; for the Post-Master General is not liable for the default of his officers and under-agents; for this is not an antient office, as appears, Latch 81, and if it ia a new office, it is not within the reason of the antient offices; and this case differs from the cases of the same nature in mo......
  • Smith v Chrashaw, Sprat, & Ward
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the King's Bench
    • 1 January 1662
    ...Jour fuit done al prochein terme de oyer les resolutions des Judges. Et al terme al Reading fuit adjudge, q^ 1'action fuit maintainable. LATCH, 81. ALICE HABRIS V. WHITE 285 Uncore la le indictment fuit trove; ve action sur le case, lou in felonie ignoramus est trove, T. 3 Jac. Rot. 246. 6 ......
  • Constable v Clobery
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the King's Bench
    • 1 January 1662
    ...vers un de eux suffist a dire, que il ue pay, nemy quand est port vers ambideux. Et Davenport, 270 WALDEN AND GESNER V. TJRSY AND UBSY LATCH. 81. Serjeant al Roy, move Tauter exception; quia le declaration est, quod covenat inter partea predictas per indenturam fact tali die, & mostre 1'eff......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 provisions
  • 50 C.F.R. § 622.55 Closed Areas
    • United States
    • Code of Federal Regulations 2023 Edition Title 50. Wildlife and Fisheries Chapter VI. Fishery Conservation and Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce Part 622. Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic Subpart C. Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico
    • 1 January 2023
    ...the following points is open to trawling: From point F, as specified in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, to point Q at 24°46.7' N lat., 81°52.2' W long. (on the line denoting the seaward limit Florida's waters); thence along the seaward limit of Florida's waters, as shown on the current ed......
  • 47 C.F.R. § 22.627 Effective Radiated Power Limits
    • United States
    • Code of Federal Regulations 2023 Edition Title 47. Telecommunication Chapter I. Federal Communications Commission Subchapter B. Common Carrier Services Part 22. Public Mobile Services Subpart E. Paging and Radiotelephone Service Point-To-Multipoint Operation
    • 1 January 2023
    ...IL, 40°04'11.1" N. Lat. 87°54'45.1" W. Long. Madison, WI, 43°03'01.0" N. Lat. 89°29'15.4" W. Long. Parkersburg, WV, 39°20'50.3" N. Lat. 81°33'55.5" W. Long. Fort Wayne, 41°05'35.2" N. Lat. 85°10'41.9" W. Long. Lancaster, PA, 40°15'45.3" N. Lat. 76°27'47.9" W. Long. South Bend, IN, 41°36'26.......
  • 50 C.F.R. § 622.274 Pelagic Longline Closed Areas
    • United States
    • Code of Federal Regulations 2023 Edition Title 50. Wildlife and Fisheries Chapter VI. Fishery Conservation and Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce Part 622. Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic Subpart M. Dolphin and Wahoo Fishery of the Atlantic
    • 1 January 2023
    ...79°12' W. long.; thence proceeding in a southerly direction along the outer boundary of the EEZ to 24° N. lat.; thence due west to 24° N. lat., 81°47' W. long.; thence due north to the innermost boundary of the EEZ 81°47' W. long. (b) A vessel is considered to have pelagic longline gear on ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT