Smith v Chrashaw, Sprat, & Ward
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1662 |
| Date | 01 January 1662 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 284
King's Bench Division
[79] smith versus chrashaw, sprat, & ward. Smith port uri action sur case versus Chrashaw, Sprat, & Ward, pur conspiront de inditer luy de haut treason. Le plaintiff declare, q, fuit un des bone subjects le Roy, & q^ ceux defendants fauxment, & malitiouament conspire de inditer luy pur treasonable parols versus Boy, & q, fauxment accuse luy devant un jnstice del peace del dit county, &ò k ils out un garrant del dit justice al constable de apprehender luy; per ^ fuit apprehend, & amesne devant le dit justice, & commit al prison del Norwich. Et p c conspiracy, un inditement fuit prefer al grand enquest, & un ignoramus trove, & doncj^ fuit mise a large ; et declare a son grand dammages. Ward, & Sprat plead uon culp, & trove culp. Chrashaw pleade, ^ le dit Sprat dit a luy, ^ le plaintiff ad dit ceux parols, & a discharge luy mesme del aspersion de concealement del treason, il accuse luy devant un justice, & ad luy arrest. Absque hoc, quod falso conspir. &c. Et c plea fuit trove versus luy p le jury. Fuit dit, c^ si un home soit endifce de felony fauxment, conspiracy gist apres acquittal, & un action sur le case en nature de conspiracy apf ignoramus trove. A fortiore ad estre enditer del treason, q^ est un pluis transcendent crime, &c. Et monstre presidents T. 3 Jac. Eot. 246. Et la count pur conspiracy pur inditer un feme de witchcraft. Et ignoramus trove, 6 Jac. Rot. 921. en cest Court, en un action sur le case pur enditer un de rape, & ignoramus trove; fuit adjudge, q^ Faction gist versus deux. 19 Jac. Rot. 1633. en c Court, pur conspiracy, pur stealing des feathers, sur un ignoramus trove, action gist. Fuit object, q, un actiou sur le case tie gist en case de treason, quia c est un tender case ; quia si 1'action serra maintainable, voil estre uri terror al subject de prosecute un pur treason, & si le subject conceale le treason, donq^ est en danger d'estre un traytor. Mes quant a ceo, si ascun chargera un auter del treason colourably, p voy de execution del justice, c est un tender case; mes quand un serra charge fauxment, & malitiousment pur treason, c est un tort al Roy de traher le vie de son subject en question sans cause; et pur c le Roy avera un indictment envers le conspirator, & il avera un villanous judgement, & le party auxi avera son remedy, Fuit argue pur le defendant, quo nul judgement [80] serra clone; quia est un grand difference inter le case...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Savill against Roberts
...upon the case ; he shall not indeed say (i) 9 Co. 59. S. C. Moor, 813. (c) Jones, 93. S. C. 2 Roll. Rep. 258. S. C. 2 Bulst. 271. S. C. Latch, 79. S. C. Palm. 315. S. C. Cro. Car. 15. (a) Ray. 180. S. C. 1 Vent. 23. (b) 4 Co. 16. 12 MOD. 211. MICHAELMAS TERM, 10 WILL. 3. IN B. R. 1269 gener......
-
Ward v Kidswin
...solement pur Hamburgh money, c n'eat ascun value, & est si come ad estre port d'un piece de plate ; mes il doubt le 284 SMITH V. CHRASHAW LATCH, 79. quel 1'action poet estre port en le debet. Reg. 139. De catallis 1'action doit eatre eu le detinet. Pluis apres fol. 84. English Reports Cita......
-
Skinner against Gunton, Lyon and Leson
...Gunton, Lyon and Leson See S. C. 1 Wms. Saund. 228. 70. skinner against gunton, lyon and leson. [See S. C. 1 Wms. Saund. 228.] Conspiracy. Latch, 79 & 80. In action sur case, in nature of conspiracy, for causing a plaint to be levied where there was no cause of action, and causing the plain......
-
Dewell against Sanders
...lie for maliciously prosecuting a man for felony, although the grand jury throw out the bill. Ante, 8. 19 L. 1 Roll. Ab. 114. Yelv. 46. Latch. 79. Hob. 267. 1 Salk. 14. 21. 1 Mod. 261. Stra. 691. 977. Onslow's N. P. 12. 1 Hawk. P.C. 347. Dougl. 215. 2 Ter. Rep. 232. Error of a judgment in a......
-
50 C.F.R. § 635.21 Gear Operation and Deployment Restrictions
...by 79°06.0' W. long. (D) Charleston Deep Artificial Reef. Bounded by rhumb lines connecting, in order, the following points: 32°05.04' N lat. 79°13.575' W long.; 32°9.65' N lat., 79°9.2' W long.; 32°7.155' N 79°5.595' W long.; 32°2.36' N lat., 79°9.975' W long.; 32°5.04' N lat., 79°13.575' ......
-
50 C.F.R. § 635.21 [Effective Until1/1/2023] Gear Operation and Deployment Restrictions
...by 79°06.0' W. long. (D) Charleston Deep Artificial Reef. Bounded by rhumb lines connecting, in order, the following points: 32°05.04' N lat. 79°13.575' W long.; 32°9.65' N lat., 79°9.2' W long.; 32°7.155' N 79°5.595' W long.; 32°2.36' N lat., 79°9.975' W long.; 32°5.04' N lat., 79°13.575' ......
-
50 C.F.R. § 635.21 [Effective1/1/2023] Gear Operation and Deployment Restrictions
...by 79°06.0' W. long. (D) Charleston Deep Artificial Reef. Bounded by rhumb lines connecting, in order, the following points: 32°05.04' N lat. 79°13.575' W long.; 32°9.65' N lat., 79°9.2' W long.; 32°7.155' N 79°5.595' W long.; 32°2.36' N lat., 79°9.975' W long.; 32°5.04' N lat., 79°13.575' ......
-
50 C.F.R. § 635.21 Gear Operation and Deployment Restrictions
...west by 79°06.0' W. long. (D) Charleston Deep Artificial Reef. Bounded by rhumb lines connecting, in order, the following points: 32°9.65' N lat., 79°9.2' long.; 32°7.155' N lat., 79°5.595' W long.; 32°2.36' N lat., 79°9.975' W long.; 32°5.04' N lat., 79°13.575' W long. (E) Georgia. Bounded......