AMB Generall Holding AG v Manches and Others

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date10 November 2005
Neutral Citation[2005] EWCA Civ 1237
Date10 November 2005
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)

COURT OF APPEAL

Before Lord Justice Buxton, Lord Justice Tuckey and Lord Justice Maurice Kay

AMB Generall Holding AG
and
Manches and Others
Solicitor under no liablity for incorrect naming of client;The Register

SOLICITORS conducting proceedings should not be held to warrant that they had correctly named their client.

The Court of Appeal (Lord Justice Buxton, Lord Justice Tuckey and Lord Justice Maurice Kay) so stated on November 10, 2005, dismissing an appeal of Seb Trygg Liv Holding Aktiebolag, from the rejection by Mrs Justice Gloster on January 20, 2005, of a claim for damages for breach of warranty against the defendant solicitors: Manches, Sprecher Grier Halberstam and Portner & Jaskel, in relation to an arbitration proceedings commenced in November 1998 in which they had acted on behalf of a corporate client which on October 13, 1997, had ceased to exist.

The judge had held that the solicitors had an ostensible authority to act and that the successor in title to the company had ratified the proceedings.

LORD JUSTICE BUXTON said that the warranty which a solicitor gave was that he had a client who had instructed him to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
30 cases
3 books & journal articles
  • Litigation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume III - Third Edition
    • 13 Abril 2020
    ...Est (Scotland) Ltd v Hanson Concrete Products Ltd [2005] 1 WLR 2557 (CA); AMB Generali Holding AG v SEB Trygg Liv Holding Aktiebolag [2005] EWCA Civ 1237 at [51]; ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Hiscox Dedicated Corporate Member Ltd [2007] EWHC 1150 (Comm); Greenwood v Papademetri [2007] NSWCA ......
  • Case Note
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2011, December 2011
    • 1 Diciembre 2011
    ...rely on its withdrawal by a private communication to X unless this was communicated to B before he acted on the representation.” 85 [2006] 1 WLR 2276; [2005] EWCA Civ 1237 at [28]-[33]. This case was apparently not cited in Orix Capital. 86 (1882) 7 App Cas 345 (HL). 87 The separate questio......
  • Agency and Partnership Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2010, December 2010
    • 1 Diciembre 2010
    ...until such impression has been dispelled, in particular by notice of revocation of the authority: see SEB Trygg Liv AB v Manches [2006] 1 WLR 2276 at [32]. Although Rebecca had retired, there was no indication in the facts that this had been brought to Orix“s attention before the formation ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT