Application to set aside a transaction defrauding creditors

AuthorMark Watson-Gandy
Pages377-391
Chapter 26


Application to Set Aside a Transaction Defrauding Creditors

OBJECTIVE

The court has wide powers1to rewind transfers of the company’s property which have been undertaken for no consideration or for significantly less than the value in money or money’s worth provided by the company where the transaction has been entered into for the purpose of either putting assets beyond the reach of a person who is making or may make a claim against the company or otherwise prejudicing such a person’s interests in such a claim.2This does not need to be the sole or main purpose of the transfer, but should be shown to be a real and substantial purpose behind the transaction.3The provision has extra-territorial effect.4

‘Transaction’ is flexibly interpreted and covers arrangements spanning from formal contracts to informal understandings.5Fraud does not need to be shown. Nor does the company need to be insolvent at the time of the transaction.

APPLICATION

The application is made by application notice (on Form IAA) or by claim form in ordinary chancery litigation.

If made by application, the application must recite the nature of the declaration sought and the grounds for bringing the application.6

The application should be returnable to the registrar in the Companies Court or to the district judge in a Chancery District Registry or county court with insolvency jurisdiction.

1Non-exclusive examples of possible orders the court can make are listed at section 425(1) of the

Insolvency Act 1986

2Section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986.

3Hashmi v IRC [2002] EWCA Civ 981.

4 HMRC v Begum [2010] EWHC 799 (Admin); Jetivia v Bilta [2015] UKSC 23.

5Feakins v DEFRA [2005] EWCA Civ 1513, [2006] BPIR 895.

6Rule 1.35(2) of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.

378 Corporate Insolvency Practice

The applicant can be the Official Receiver, the liquidator or administrator of the company or a victim of the company. If the company is in administration or liquidation, a victim will need the permission of the court to make this application. ‘Victim’ is flexibly interpreted.7A creditor can be a victim for these purposes.8Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs can be a victim for these purposes where the purpose of the transaction was to mislead them as to the tax liability.9

The respondent should be the person who made the transfer and any other party to the transaction that the applicant is seeking to set aside.

COURT FEES

Where fresh proceedings need to be brought, a court fee of £280 is payable.10If

the application can be made as part of exisiting proceedings and the application is on notice to other parties, a court fee of £155 is payable.11Where the application is made by consent or without notice in existing proceedings, a court fee of £50 is payable.12

EVIDENCE

The application should be supported by a witness statement by the liquidator or administrator. This will need to address:

ƒ the capacity in which the deponent makes this application (e.g. victim, liquidator, etc);
ƒ the order he seeks;
ƒ the date the company was incorporated;
ƒ the registered office of the company;
ƒ the nominal share capital of the company;
ƒ the issued share capital of the company;
ƒ the objects of the company;
ƒ the date upon which the petition to wind up the company or place it into administration or notice of administration was presented (if applicable);
ƒ the date upon which the company went into liquidation or administration

(if applicable);
ƒ the date of the transaction subject to challenge;
ƒ the particulars of the transaction subject to challenge;
ƒ the value of the company’s asset transferred under the transaction;

7Hill v Spread Trustee Co Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 542, [2006] BPIR 789.

8Re Ayala Holdings Ltd [1993] BCLC 256.

9Hill v Spread Trustee Co Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 542, [2006] BPIR 789.

10Paragraph 3.5 of Schedule 1 to the Civil Proceedings Fees Order 2008.

11Paragraph 3.12 of Schedule 1 to the Civil Proceedings Fees Order 2008.

12Paragraph 3.11 of Schedule 1 to the Civil Proceedings Fees Order 2008.

ƒ that the asset was transferred for no consideration or identifying the price it was transferred for and stating that this was significantly less than its value in money or money’s worth;

ƒ why it is said that the transaction has been entered into for the purpose of either putting assets beyond the reach of a person who is making, or may make, a claim against the company or otherwise prejudicing such a person’s interests in such a claim;

ƒ (in so far as there is an application to set aside the transaction) that the proposed order will not prejudice any interest in property that was acquired in good faith, for value and without notice of the relevant circumstances;13

ƒ (in so far as there is an application to set aside the transaction) that the proposed order will not require a person who has received a benefit from the transaction in good faith, for value and without notice of the relevant circumstances to pay any sum unless he was not a party to the transaction.14

The witness statement should exhibit:

ƒ (as applicable) evidence of his appointment as liquidator or administrator or of the basis upon which the applicant asserts he was a victim of the transaction;

ƒ (as applicable) a copy of the winding up or administration order;
ƒ evidence of the transaction subject to challenge;
ƒ evidence of the company’s ownership of the asset transferred;
ƒ evidence of the transaction under which the company’s asset was transferred and of its date;
ƒ evidence of the consideration (if any) paid under the transaction;
ƒ an independent valuation of the property disposed of showing its value at the date of the transaction (to show the transaction was at a significant undervalue).

THE FIRST HEARING

At the first hearing, the registrar or district judge will give directions as to whether points of claim are needed and for the filing of evidence. He may also require the application to be served on other people. He may give directions as to whether witnesses are to attend for cross examination. The first hearing is likely to be heard in chambers and the advocates are not expected to robe.

SERVICE

The application and the evidence in support will need to be filed at court and served on the respondent as soon as practicable after it is filed and in any event,

13Pre-empting the possible defence under section 425(2) of...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT