Bhamjee v Forsdick and Others
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2005] EWHC 350 (Admin) |
| Date | 2005 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 cases
-
Colley v Council for Licensed Conveyancers
...whom it is made from instituting or carrying on proceedings without the leave of the court." There is then a reference to the case of Bhamjee v. Forsdick, to which I will come shortly. Under para.3.13 the editors say this: "Normally it is not expected that a civil restraint order will be ma......
-
Jeevani Wickramaratna v Cambridge University Chemistry Department
...Direction to which I have just referred and which comments on Rule 2.4. The applicant has already drawn my attention to the case of Bhamjee v Forsdick No 2 [2003] EWCA Civ 1113, which is the foundation of the Civil Restraint Order, as it is now called, or what used to be known as a Grepe v ......
-
YD (Turkey) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...that a significant injustice had probably occurred and that there was no alternative effective remedy. 17 More recently, in Bhamjee v Forsdick (Practice Note) [2003] EWCA Civ 1113, [2004] 1 WLR 88 this court made it clear (at para 15) that it had power to take appropriate action whenever i......
-
Supperstone v Hurst
...shown that: (1) The respondent has persistently issued claims or made applications which are totally without merit. As was explained in Bhamjee v Forsdick [2004] 1 WLR 88 per Lord Phillips MR at [42], “we do not include the word 'habitual' among the necessary criteria for an extended civil ......
Request a trial to view additional results