Bodha (Vishnudut) v Hampshire Area Health Authority

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
Date1982
Year1982

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
104 cases
  • Ashcroft v Haberdashers Aske's Boys School
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Appeal Tribunal
    • Invalid date
  • Palmer v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 19 Enero 1984
    ...the Appeal Tribunal agreed with the decision of another division of the tribunal, presided over by the then President, in Bodha v. Hampshire Area Health Authority (1982) I.C.R. 200 that the words "reasonably practicable" in section 67(2) meant reasonably capable of being done and not merely......
  • Schultz v Esso Petroleum Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 18 Marzo 1999
    ...Act 1978, the forerunner of section 111 of the 1996 Act, he stated at 384F to 385F, quoting Mr Justice Browne-Wilkinson in Bodha's case [1982] I.C.R. 200 at 204: "'The statutory test remains one of practicability. The statutory words still require the industrial tribunal to have regard to ......
  • Noel v London Underground Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 29 Junio 1999
    ...decision of an Industrial Tribunal on reasonable practicability. 17 Mr. Hughes relied on what was said by the EAT in Bodha v Hants Area Authority [1982] I.C.R. 200 at p.205 where Browne-Wilkinson J. said: "There may be cases where the special facts (additional to the fact that there is an i......
  • Get Started for Free