Bracey v Read
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1962 |
Year | 1962 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Pumperninks of Piccadilly Ltd v Land Securities Plc and Others
...is or includes premises which are occupied by the tenant and are so occupied for the purposes of a business carried on by him …." In Bracey v Read [1963] Ch 88, Mr Justice Cross held that, in that context, "premises" was synonymous with "property comprised in the tenancy"- although "premise......
-
National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty v Knipe and Another
...in the strict legal sense of "the subject-matter of the habendum" (Viscount Hailsham in Whitley v Stumbles [1930] AC 544 at 547 and Bracey v Read [1963] Ch 88). In Maunsell v Olins [1975] AC 373, however, the House of Lords held, by a majority, that in the context of s 18(5) of the Rent Act......
-
Maunsell v Olins
...which it bears as a term of art (i.e., the subject-matter of the habendum clause of a lease: Whitley v. Stumbles [1930] A.C. 544, 546; Bracey v. Read [1963] 1 Ch. 88, 92). But, in fact, these two statutory situations—dealing with ordinary people in their everyday lives, on the one hand, and......
-
Dallhold Estates (UK) Pty Ltd v Lindsey Trading Properties Inc.
...capable of a wide range of meanings: reference was made to Maunsell v. Olins [1975] AC 373; to Whitley v. Stumbles [1930] AC 544; and to Bracey v. Read [1963] Ch. 88. Within that wide range, the meaning which it was intended to have for the purposes of the 1987 Act must be determined by con......
Request a trial to view additional results