British Steel Corporation v Cleveland Bridge and Engineering Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1984 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
102 cases
- TTMI Sarl v Statoil ASA (The "Sibohelle")
-
Astra Asset Management UK v The Co-operative Bank Plc
...decision as to whether a claim lies for restitution. 151 In British Steel Corporation v. Cleveland Bridge and Engineering Co. Ltd. [1984] 1 All E.R. 504 the defendant had successfully tendered for the fabrication of steelwork to be used in the construction of a building. It entered into ne......
-
Cubitt Building & Interiors Ltd v Richardson Roofing (Industrial) Ltd
...Intent” does not particularly add anything to its legal status. As has been accepted in numerous cases such as British Steel Corporation v. Cleveland Bridge & Engineering Co. [1981] 24 BLR 94, letters of intent can evidence or create a contract where none exist or simply be an indication th......
-
Whittle Movers Ltd v Hollywood Express Ltd
...Ltd v Marks & Spencer plcUNK [2001] EWCA Civ 274; [2001] CLC 999. British Steel Corp v Cleveland Bridge & Engineering Co LtdUNK [1984] 1 All ER 504. Contract — Restitution — Tenders invited for new sub-contract for distribution services — Negotiations with appellant as winning tenderer for ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
The Importance of Being Evidenced - RJT Consulting Engineers Ltd. v. DM Engineering (NI) Ltd, Court of Appeal, 8 March 2002
...sub-contractors (see British Steel Corporation v. Cleveland Bridge & Engineering Co. Ltd. (1981) 24 BLR 94, [1984] 1 All ER 504). If that weren't reason There is now, however, a further reason to get those documents executed, and that follows the decision of the Court of Appeal in RJT C......
-
Court Of Appeal Finds Interim Contract Incorporated Terms And Conditions Including Limitation Of Liability
...judge should have reached a different conclusion. The court referred to British Steel Corp v Cleveland Bridge & Engineering Co Ltd [1984] 1 All ER 504, in which Goff J stated that, if parties are in a stage of negotiation and one party asks the other to begin work "pending" the parties ......
8 books & journal articles
-
Contract formation
...LR 154 at 183 [120], per Christopher Clarke J. 124 Sometimes referred to as an “if ” contract: British Steel Corp v Cleveland Bridge [1984] 1 All ER 504 at 509–510, per Robert Gof J; Amec Capital Projects Ltd v Whitefriars City Estate Ltd [2003] EWHC 2443 (TCC) at [5], per HHJ LLoyd QC; Mow......
-
Certainty of Terms
...requirement of a price term in every conceivable building contract, see British Steel Corp v Cleveland Bridge and Engineering Co , [1984] 1 All ER 504 at 511 (QB), Goff J. Certainty of Terms 105 Similarly, the absence of a price term appeared to be the critical issue in a Canadian decision,......
-
Certainty of Terms
...requirement of a price term in every conceivable building contract, see British Steel Corp. v. Cleveland Bridge and Engineering Co ., [1984] 1 All E.R. 504 at 511 (Q.B.), Goff J. 25 (1988), 40 B.L.R. 128 (Ont. H.C.), aff’d (Sept. 11, 1991, Doc. No. C.A. 425/88). THE LAW OF CONTR ACTS 100 As......
-
Informal and political agreements as sources of obligation? Sketching a theory of international political normativity
...are not viewed as expressions of intent to be bound in English law. See British Steel Corp v. Cleveland Bridge and Engineering Co Ltd [1984] 1 All ER 504. Where, however, the language in such an instrument is sufficiently clear, the court will have little problem finding intent. See Damon......
Request a trial to view additional results