Brown v Heathlands Mental Health National Health Service Trust
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1996 |
Date | 1996 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
- Thames Water Utilities Ltd v Oxford City Council and another
- Wagstaff and another v Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
-
Thames Water Utilities Ltd (Plaintiff) v Oxford City Council and Another
...detail in due course, Kirby v School Board for Harrogate [1896] 1 Ch 437, and Brown v Heathlands Mental Health National Service Trust [1996] 1 All ER 133. The proposition that he advances in that paragraph is, however, common ground before this court, although the precise effect of appropri......
- Greenwich Healthcare National Health Service Trust v London and Quadrant Housing Trust
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...xxvii Broomfield v Williams [1897] 1 Ch 602 11 Brown v Alabaster (1887) 37 Ch D 490 11 Brown v Heathlands Mental Health NHS Trust [1996] 1 All ER 133, (1996) 31 BMLR 57, ChD 268, 337 Brown’s Application, Re (1978) 35 P & CR 254, [1977] JPL 731, LT 329 Broxbourne Borough Council v Secret......
-
Restrictive Covenants and Other Restrictions on the Use of Freehold Land in Public Ownership
...para 31.5, ‘Compulsory purchase’. 40 Kirby v Harrogate School Board [1896] 1 Ch 437. 41 Brown v Heathlands Mental Health NHS Trust [1996] 1 All ER 133. injurious affection. 42 The payment of compensation will not, however, extinguish the covenant. In such a case the covenant is suspended, 4......
-
Restrictive Covenants - Planning and Compulsory Purchase
...See Re 6, 8, 10 and 12 Elm Avenue, New Milton ex parte New Forest DC [1984] 1 WLR 1398, and Brown v Heathlands Mental Health NHS Trust [1996] 1 All ER 133, for the principle that private rights affecting land would not be enforceable by way of injunction or damages (whether the land had bee......