Bull v Bodie
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1559 |
| Date | 01 January 1559 |
| Court | High Court of Chancery |
English Reports Citation: 21 E.R. 166
HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY
S. C. Cary, 50.
REPORTS of CASES Argued and Determined in the HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY. Collected by John Dickens, Esq., Late Senior Register of that Court [1559-1798]. bull v. bodie. (Lib. Reg. A. fol. 263.) 2 & 3 Eliz. A.D. 1559. Injunction to stay a party from proceeding at law for land, where a bill brought by him merely to recover the same land, was depending in Chancery. Entry of an injunction to stay the defendant's proceedings at law states, that the defendant, John Bodie, had preferred a petition in Chancery against the plaintiff Robert Bull, and one James Young, his then tenant, for recovery of four tenements in Wellington, in the county of Somerset, which the plaintiff stated to have come to him as heir of the body of Lucy Bodie, under an entail created by the will of John Cumbersbat; and that an answer had been put in by the said Robert Bull and James Young, by which Bull disclaimed as .to two tenements, but as to the others said, they did not pass by the will, but descended to the testator's two sisters, his co-heiresses at law; that they made a partition, [2] by which one was allotted to one sister (whose heir at law was the defendant Bodie), and that the other was allotted to Joanna the other sister, the wife of Robert Taylor; that she entered, and enjoyed, and the same descended to Joanna Taylor, her heiress at law, and that the plaintiff Bull...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Axis International Ltd Plaintiff v The Civil Aviation Authority of the Cayman Islands (Caaci) 1st Defendant Cayman Islands Helicopters Ltd 2nd Defendant
...is an area of specific dimensions which must be clear of obstacles and debris to facilitate take off and landing (see OTAR 139.1.27(f) and Dick 1 para. 12 B/3). From ICAO Annex 14 Volume 11 Definitions, one also sees that the Safety Area is intended to reduce the risk of damage to helicopte......
-
Richard White, Francis Jenks Burlton, Vincent Wheeler, and James Eysam Graham, - Appellants; Job Walker Baugh and Thomas Beale, - Respondents
...that case in Wren v. Kirton (11 Ves. 377)].-There is no case in which the principle laid down in Knight v. Lord Plymouth, as reported in Dickens (1 Dick. 120) is expressly dissented from. On the contrary, it is distinctly recognized and acted upon in Eowth v. Howell (3 Ves. 565), and Lord R......
-
Marquis of Lansdowne and Others v Marchioness Dowager of Lansdowne
...bill. Sir Samuel Romilly, Mr. Bell, and Mr. Shadwell, against the demurrer. In Gartfi v. Cotton, the judgment in which case is given in Dickens (1 Dick. 183. S. C. 3 Atk. 75], and 1 Ves. 524, 546), he states the grounds on [133] which he decided Jesus College v. Bloom, and says, " It is tru......
-
Lloyd v Williams
...from that time the decisions have uniformly been according to that case. The next authority is Cockel v. Phipps, which, from the report in Dickens (1 Dick. 391), appears to be a case in favour of the infant; but on consulting the register's book, the matter is explained. In that case Phipps......
-
Where There's Smoke: How Employers Can Navigate Employees' Cannabis Use
...safety-sensitive work environments and impairment, so a decision dealing without either is unusual. Situation In Law Society of Ontario v. Dick,1 the Law Society Tribunal was asked to decide on an interlocutory suspension order for a junior lawyer suspected of unfitness. Mr. Dick had threat......
-
Bootstraps Auction Preference Under Consideration
...is considering the establishment of a spectrum auction “preference” for individuals or entities who have “faced substantial disadvantages and...
-
SHOT SELECTION.
...PAGE: GREAT WRITERS TALK ABOUT STYLE AND VOICE IN WRITING 44 (2005). (28.) RALPH ELLISON, INVISIBLE MAN 1 (1952). (29.) HERMAN MELVILLE, MOBY DICK 1 (1851). The range here is (30.) ANDY WEIR, THE MARTIAN 1 (2014). The range here is twenty-four. (31.) Pottow Brief, supra note 19, at 9-10 (ci......
-
British Journal of Management Index Volume 19 2008
...19 Issue Number 1 March 2008 Editorial Rolf van Dick. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Leadership and Effectiveness in the Context of Gender: The Role of Leaders' Verbal Gisela Mohr and Hans‐Joachim Wolfram. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Similarities and Differences bet......
-
Texas Register, Volume 39, Number 47, November 21, 2014
...permit is required for spraying regulated herbicides during the months of January and February of each year.] (j) - (n) (No change.) (o) Dickens. (1) The application of all ester formulations of regulated herbicides is prohibited between May 15 and September 15. [No permit is required for t......
-
Texas Register, Volume 40, Number 07, February 13, 2015
...of each year. (n) Delta. The aerial application of regulated herbicides is pro- hibited between April 15 and September 1 of each year. (o) Dickens. (1) The application of all ester formulations of regulated herbicides is prohibited between May 15 and September (2) The application of regulat......