Bulli Coal Mining Company v Osborne
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1899 |
| Date | 1899 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
53 cases
-
Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter
...Solicitors Regulation Authority [2014] EWHC 2974 (Admin). Brocklesby v Armitage & Guest [2002] 1 WLR 598. Bulli Coal Mining Co v Osborne [1899] AC 351. Cave v Robinson Jarvis & Rolf (a firm) [2002] UKHL 18; [2003] 1 CLC 101; [2003] 1 AC 384. Clark v Woor [1965] 1 WLR 650. De Beers UK Ltd v ......
- Beaman v A.R.T.S. Ltd
-
O'Dwyer v Daughters of Charity of St Vincent de Paul and Others
...were the conduct in question to be furtive or surreptitious, such as was found to be the case in Bulli Coal Mining Co. v. Osborne [1899] A.C. 351, a case where the defendant had taken coal over a long period by means of "a wilful and secret underground trespass." Different considerations al......
-
Sheldon v R H. M. Outhwaite (Underwriting Agencies) Ltd
...this point does not seem to have been addressed in argument, and the authority of the case must in my view be limited. 15 In Bulli Coal Mining Company v Osborne [1899] AC 351 the appellants had fraudulently and furtively mined the respondents' coal, to which (as they knew) they were not ent......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Action
...established. The above proposition of law succinctly laid down in the case of Bulli Coal Mining Co. v. Patrick Hill Osborne and Another (1899) A.C. 351 at 363(P.C) where Lord James of Hereford delivering the judgment of her Majesty’s Privy Council in England put the matter thus: - “Now it h......