C. Van der Lely N.v v Bamfords Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtHouse of Lords
Date1963
Year1963

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
70 cases
  • Schlumberger Holdings Ltd v Electromagnetic Geoservices as
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division (Patents Court)
    • Invalid date
  • Re Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha (Appellants)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 9 May 1991
    ...Westbury L.C. in Hills v. Evans (1862) 31 L.J. Ch. 457 at 463, cited with approval by Lord Reid in C. Van der Lely N.V. v. Bamfords Ltd. [1963] R.P.C. 61 at 71: "There are two branches of this statement, the first is that 'a person of ordinary knowledge of the subject would at once perceive......
  • Kavanagh Balloons Pty Ltd v Cameron Balloons Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division (Patents Court)
    • Invalid date
  • SmithKline Beecham Plc's (Paroxetine Anhydrate) Patent
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 June 2003
    ...ground of invalidity. 67 Mr Wyand referred us to this passage in the speech of Lord Reid in C. Van Der Lely N.V v Bamford Limited [1963] RPC 61 at page 71: "The law regarding anticipation derives from Lord Westbury's statement of it in Hills v Evans (1862) 4DeG., F&J. 288. There are two......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • The Doctrine of Equivalents in Patent Law: The Impact of Actavis v Eli Lilly
    • Ireland
    • Hibernian Law Journal No. 18-2019, January 2019
    • 1 January 2019
    ...Musical Industries Ltd v. Lissen Ltd (1938) 56 RPC 23. See Laddie (n 13) 9. 18 Kirin Amgen v HMR (n 14) [36]. 19 Van der Lely v Bamfords [1963] RPC 61; Laddie (n 13) 19. 20 Laddie (n 13) 19. he Doctrine of Equivalents in Patent Law 71 Pre-Actavis Position he position pre-Actavis is discusse......