Champagne Heidsieck et cie Monopole Societe Anonyme v Buxton
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1930 |
| Year | 1930 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 cases
-
Ng Chye Mong Pte Ltd v Public Prosecutor
...beginning with the Act of 1875 in England did not change the fundamental nature of a trade mark. In Champagne Heidsieck et Cie v Buxton [1930] 1 Ch 330, the court held that the proprietor`s `exclusive right` was a right which had existed at common law to prevent others from selling wares wh......
-
Self Care IP Holdings Pty Ltd v Allergan Australia Pty Ltd
...144 at 160 [33], citing The Shell Co of Australia Ltd v Esso Standard Oil (Australia) Ltd (1963) 109 CLR 407 and Champagne Heidsieck et Cie Monopole Societe Anonyme v Buxton [1930] 1 Ch 51 Woolworths Ltd v BP Plc [No 2] (2006) 154 FCR 97 at 117 [77]. 52 Pepsico Australia Pty Ltd v Kettle C......
-
Protective Mining & Industrial Equipment Systems (Pty) Ltd (Formerly Hampo Systems (Pty) Ltd) v Audiolens (Cape) (Pty) Ltd
...conduct had not been covered by s 44(1)(a). Appeal dismissed. Champagne Heidsieck et Cie Monopole Societe Anonyme v Buxton E [1930] 1 Ch 330 The decision in Hampo Systems (Pty) v Audiolens (Cape) (Pty) Ltd 1985 (4) SA 257 (C) confirmed. Case Information Appeal from a decision in the Cape pr......
- Sporte Leisure Pty Ltd v Paul's International Pty Ltd (No 3)
Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
-
Exhaustion In The UK: IP Law Under Review
...Imperial Tobacco Company of India, Limited v Bonnan & Ors [1924] A.C. 755, Privy Council; Champagne Heidsiek et Cie Monopole SA v Buxton [1930] 1 Ch 330, High Court Chancery Division 24. Revlon Inc & Ors v Cripps & Lee Ltd & Ors [1980] FSR 85, Court of Appeal 25. Sony v Saray Electronics [1......
-
Exhaustion In The UK: IP Law Under Review
...Imperial Tobacco Company of India, Limited v Bonnan & Ors [1924] A.C. 755, Privy Council; Champagne Heidsiek et Cie Monopole SA v Buxton [1930] 1 Ch 330, High Court Chancery Division 24. Revlon Inc & Ors v Cripps & Lee Ltd & Ors [1980] FSR 85, Court of Appeal 25. Sony v Saray Electronics [1......
-
Nowhere to run for grey goods importers? Full Federal Court restricts parallel importation defence
...The section 123 defence is a statutory embodiment of the well established principle in the United Kingdom case, Champagne Heidsieck [1930] 1 Ch 330, which refused to treat trade marks as badges of control and stated that they were badges of origin, designating a genuine source. In that case......
-
Best Australian and New Zealand Trade Mark Cases of 2012 - Part 1
...registered owner of the mark. In addition, Paul's asserted that the case of Champagne Heidsieck et Cie Monopole Société Anonyme v Buxton [1930] 1 Ch 330 established a principle that there can be no infringement of a registered trade mark in respect of the importation and supply of "genuine ......
4 books & journal articles
-
Popular Names Index to UK Cases and EU Legislation and Cases
...for pesticide residues in and on cereals (OJ 1986 L221/37) Champagne Cases Champagne Heidsieck et Cie Monopole Society Anonyme v Buton [1930] 1 Ch 330 J Bollinger Ltd v Costa Brava Wine Co Ltd (No 1) [1960] Ch 262 J Bollinger Ltd v Costa Brava Wine Co Ltd (No 2) [1961] 1 WLR 277 Channel Tun......
-
PARALLEL IMPORTS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN SINGAPORE
...been raised, but with less success, in trade mark law and passing off. See Champagne Heidsiek et Cie Monopole Societe Anonyme v Buxton[1930] 1 Ch. 330, 47 RPC 28 and Colgate - Palmolive Ltd. & Anor. v Markwell Finance & Anor. [1989] RPC 497. In copyright law, arguments based on implied cons......
-
RIGHTS AND DEFENCES AT THE INTERFACE OF COPYRIGHT AND TRADE MARK LAW: A CLOSER LOOK AT THE “ARTISTICALLY ENDOWED TRADE MARK” PHENOMENON
...SJLS 167 to 240. 59 Supra note 1, at [19] to [22]. 60 6 IPR 279. 61 (1986) 6 IPR 102. 62 Supra note 60, at 289 to 290. 63 [1930] 1 Ch 330. 64 Halsbury’s Laws of England, 4th Ed, vol 48, para 94. 65 Although it may of course be argued that reproduction of an artistic work by any person other......
-
DISENTANGLING FUNCTIONALITY, DISTINCTIVENESS AND USE IN AUSTRALIAN TRADE MARK LAW.
...6th ed, 2016) 658. (141) Irving's Yeast-Vite Ld v Horsenail (1934) 51 RPC 110. (142) Champagne Heidsieck et Cie Monopole SA v Buxton [1930] 1 Ch 330. (143) Wingate Marketing Pty Ltd v Levi Strauss & Co (1994) 49 FCR (144) Musidor BV v Tansing (1994) 52 FCR 363. (145) The relevant cases ......
1 provisions
-
20 U.S.C. § 2a Repealed
...L. 89-554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 647Notes from the Office of Law Revision Counsel: Section, act May 26, 1930, ch. 330, 46 Stat. 384, provided for appointment of an Assistant Commissioner of...