Chandris v Argo Insurance Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1963 |
| Year | 1963 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
45 cases
-
Kastor Navigation Company Ltd v AGF MAT (Kastor to)
... ... 2 Kastor Too had been insured under a contract of marine insurance contained in a slip policy on the MAR 1991 form for a period of 24 months at 30 December 1999. Her ... ...
- Den Danske Bank A/S and Others v Skipton Building Society and Others
-
Metall Market OOO v Vitorio Shipping Company Ltd
...services under Lloyd's open form of salvage agreement are examples and in their Lordships' view it was rightly decided in Chandris v. Argo Insurance Co. Ltd. [1963] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 65, that claims for contributions in general average under contractual provisions which do no more than require......
- Socony Mobil Oil Company Inc. v West of England Ship Owners Mutual Insurance Association (London) Ltd (No 2) (Padre Island)
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
THE CESSATION OF SUE AND LABOUR
...Polurrian Steamship, supra n 12; Rickards v Forestal Land, supra n 17; the Kuwait Airways case, supra n 57, at 697, per Rix J. 113 [1963] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 65. 114 Chandris v Argo Insurance Company, Ltd, ibid, at 74; approved by the Privy Council in Castle Insurance Co Ltd v Hong Kong Islands S......
-
Limitation of action considerations in respect of U.K. insurers.
...(1.) [1985] 1 A11 E.R. 243. (2.) [1989] 1 Lloyd's Rep 239, overruled [1990] 2 A11 E.R. 705 (H.L.) on separate point. (3.) [1963] 2 Lloyd's Rep 65. (4.) See Amantilla v. Telefusion, [1987] 9 Con. L.R. 139 quantum meruit claim held to qualify as "liquidated claim"). (5.) [1965] 3 A11 E.R. 818......
-
Insurers, Claims and the Boundaries of Good Faith
...notes that the authorities commonly cited in supportof this proposition (seeThe Fanti, n 28 above,Chandris vArgo In s Co Ltd [1963 ] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 65, at73-74 and CastleIns vHong Ko ng Shipping [1984]AC 226 (PC)) Chandris (and the approvalof it inCastle) were distingui shed and limited to m......