Chatenay v Brazilian Submarine Telegraph Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1891 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
47 cases
-
Sutherland v Stopes
...however, been adopted and sanctioned ever since the decision of Mathew and Grantham, JJ. in ( Penrhyn v. Licensed Victuallers' Mirror 1890, 7. T.L.R. 1.) and must now be accepted as proper pleading." 74 The Penrhyn case contains the pleading thus: "In so far as they consist of allegations o......
- Attorney-General (New South Wales) v Brewery Employees Union of New South Wales
-
Lucio Robert Paciocco and Another v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd
...at 86. 189 [1915] AC 79 at 86. 190 [1915] AC 79 at 86. 191 [1906] AC 368 at 375–376. 192 [1915] AC 79 at 86–87. 193 Cf Chatenay v Brazilian Submarine Telegraph Company [1891] 1 QB 79 at 194 [1915] AC 79 at 87. 195 [1915] AC 79 at 87. 196 [1915] AC 79 at 87. 197 [1915] AC 79 at 87. 198 [1915......
- Oceanic Sun Line Special Shipping Coinc v Fay
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Choice of law in Australian torts or the truth about conflicts
...acted on in 133. E Hobsbawm, Industry and Empire (1969) at 47. 134. J Tillotson, Contract Law in Perspective (3rd edn, 1995) at 5. 135. [1891] 1 QB 79. England, the extent of the authority should be determined by English law. However, although that was the effect of the decision, there was ......
-
Constitutional Supremacy and Judicial Reasoning.
...B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, e 11 [Charter]. (10.) See e.g. Chatenay v Brazilian Submarine Telegraph Company, Limited(1890), [1891] 1 QB 79 at 85, [1886-90] All ER Rep 1135 (CA (Eng)). Lord Justice Lindley The expression "construction," as applied to a document, at all events as use......